Composite Household Vegetable Shortening has 9.5 times more energy per 100g than Baked Potato Flesh. It has very high energy density when compared to other foods. Baked Potatoes Flesh no Salt having average energy density.
Discover which food has more nutrients per 100 calories - Composite Household Vegetable Shortening or Baked Potato Flesh?
Composite Household Vegetable Shortening VS Baked Potato Flesh Nutrients Per 100 Kcal
Discover which food has more nutrients per 100 calories - Composite Household Vegetable Shortening or Baked Potato Flesh?
Lets compare vitamin content per 100 calories of Composite Household Vegetable Shortening vs Baked Potato Flesh:
100 calories of Composite Household Vegetable Shortening have 16.1 times more Vitamin E and 18.7 times more Vitamin K than Baked Potato Flesh.
While 100 kcal of Baked Potatoes Flesh no Salt contain 49.9 times more Vitamin B1, more Vitamin B3, 7.8 times more Vitamin B5, 2861.1 times more Vitamin B6, more Vitamin B9 and more Vitamin C than Composite Household Vegetable Shortening.
100 calories of Composite Household Vegetable Shortening have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B1, Vitamin B3, Vitamin B5, Vitamin B6, Vitamin B9 and Vitamin C
100 calories of Baked Potato Flesh have insufficient amounts of Vitamin E and Vitamin K
Both Composite Household Vegetable Shortening as well as Baked Potatoes Flesh no Salt have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin B2, Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D in 100 calories.
Comparing minerals per 100 calories for Composite Household Vegetable Shortening vs Baked Potato Flesh:
100 kcal of Baked Potatoes Flesh no Salt contain more Copper, 47.5 times more Iron, more Magnesium, more Manganese, more Phosphorus, more Potassium, more Zinc and more Water than Composite Household Vegetable Shortening.
100 calories of Composite Household Vegetable Shortening lack sufficient amounts of Copper, Iron, Magnesium, Manganese, Phosphorus, Potassium and Zinc
Both Composite Household Vegetable Shortening as well as Baked Potatoes Flesh no Salt lack sufficient amounts of Calcium and Selenium in 100 calories.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 100 calories:
100 calories of Composite Household Vegetable Shortening have 105.2 times more Fat, 101.1 times more Saturated Fat, 19.8 times more Omega 3 and 86.2 times more Omega 6 than Baked Potato Flesh.
While 100 kcal of Baked Potatoes Flesh no Salt contain more Carbohydrate, more Sugars, more Fiber and more Protein than Composite Household Vegetable Shortening.
Both Composite Household Vegetable Shortening and Baked Potato Flesh offer comparable quantities of Energy per 100 calories.
100 calories of Composite Household Vegetable Shortening provide inadequate amounts of Carbohydrate, Fiber and Protein
100 calories of Baked Potato Flesh provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3 and Omega 6