Nutrient Comparison: Soft Red Winter Wheat VS Cassava per 100 g
Compare the macro and micronutrient content in 100 g of Soft Red Winter Wheat versus 100 g of Cassava to make informed dietary choices. Explore their nutritional differences and benefits.
Lets compare vitamin content per 100 grams of Soft Red Winter Wheat vs Cassava:
- 100 grams of Soft Red Winter Wheat have 4.5 times more Vitamin B1, 2 times more Vitamin B2, 5.6 times more Vitamin B3, 7.9 times more Vitamin B5, 3.1 times more Vitamin B6, 1.5 times more Vitamin B9 and 5.3 times more Vitamin E than Cassava.
- While 100 g of Raw Cassava contain more Vitamin C than Soft Red Winter Wheat.
- 100 grams of Soft Red Winter Wheat have insufficient amounts of Vitamin C
- 100 grams of Cassava have insufficient amounts of Vitamin E
- Both Soft Red Winter Wheat as well as Raw Cassava have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D in 100 grams.
Comparing minerals per 100 grams for Soft Red Winter Wheat vs Cassava:
- 100 grams of Soft Red Winter Wheat have 1.7 times more Calcium, 4.5 times more Copper, 11.9 times more Iron, 6 times more Magnesium, 11.4 times more Manganese, 18.3 times more Phosphorus, 1.5 times more Potassium and 7.7 times more Zinc than Cassava.
- 100 grams of Cassava lack sufficient amounts of Calcium
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 100 grams:
- 100 grams of Soft Red Winter Wheat have 2.1 times more Energy, 19.6 times more Omega 6, 2 times more Carbohydrate, 6.9 times more Fiber and 7.6 times more Protein than Cassava.
- While 100 g of Raw Cassava contain 4.1 times more Sugars than Soft Red Winter Wheat.
- 100 grams of Cassava provide inadequate amounts of Omega 6
- Both Soft Red Winter Wheat as well as Raw Cassava provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3 in 100 grams.