Comparing Nutrients in 100 calories Composite Household Vegetable ShorteningVS Tomatoes in Juice with Salt
Weight per 100 calories
Composite Household Vegetable Shortening
11.3g
Tomatoes in Juice with Salt
625g
Composite Household Vegetable Shortening has 55.3 times more energy per 100g than Tomatoes in Juice with Salt. It has very high energy density when compared to other foods. Canned Red Ripe Tomatoes in Tomato Juice with Salt having very low energy density.
Discover which food has more nutrients per 100 calories - Composite Household Vegetable Shortening or Tomatoes in Juice with Salt?
Composite Household Vegetable Shortening VS Tomatoes In Juice With Salt Nutrients Per 100 Kcal
Discover which food has more nutrients per 100 calories - Composite Household Vegetable Shortening or Tomatoes in Juice with Salt?
Lets compare vitamin content per 100 calories of Composite Household Vegetable Shortening vs Tomatoes in Juice with Salt:
100 kcal of Canned Red Ripe Tomatoes in Tomato Juice with Salt contain more Vitamin A, 1588.4 times more Vitamin B1, more Vitamin B2, more Vitamin B3, 9.5 times more Vitamin B5, 6132.8 times more Vitamin B6, more Vitamin B9, more Vitamin C, 5.3 times more Vitamin E and 2.7 times more Vitamin K than Composite Household Vegetable Shortening.
100 calories of Composite Household Vegetable Shortening have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin B1, Vitamin B2, Vitamin B3, Vitamin B5, Vitamin B6, Vitamin B9 and Vitamin C
Both Composite Household Vegetable Shortening as well as Canned Red Ripe Tomatoes in Tomato Juice with Salt have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D in 100 calories.
Comparing minerals per 100 calories for Composite Household Vegetable Shortening vs Tomatoes in Juice with Salt:
100 kcal of Canned Red Ripe Tomatoes in Tomato Juice with Salt contain 1823.3 times more Calcium, more Copper, 449.9 times more Iron, more Magnesium, more Manganese, more Phosphorus, more Potassium, more Selenium, 1588.4 times more Sodium, more Zinc and more Water than Composite Household Vegetable Shortening.
100 calories of Composite Household Vegetable Shortening lack sufficient amounts of Calcium, Copper, Iron, Magnesium, Manganese, Phosphorus, Potassium, Selenium and Zinc
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 100 calories:
100 calories of Composite Household Vegetable Shortening have 7.2 times more Fat, 13.3 times more Saturated Fat, 8.5 times more Omega 3 and 4.9 times more Omega 6 than Tomatoes in Juice with Salt.
While 100 kcal of Canned Red Ripe Tomatoes in Tomato Juice with Salt contain more Carbohydrate, more Sugars, more Fiber and more Protein than Composite Household Vegetable Shortening.
Both Composite Household Vegetable Shortening and Tomatoes in Juice with Salt offer comparable quantities of Energy per 100 calories.
100 calories of Composite Household Vegetable Shortening provide inadequate amounts of Carbohydrate, Fiber and Protein
100 calories of Tomatoes in Juice with Salt provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3