Comparing Nutrients in 100 calories Tomato Juice with SaltVS Composite Household Vegetable Shortening
Weight per 100 calories
Tomato Juice with Salt
588g
Composite Household Vegetable Shortening
11.3g
Composite Household Vegetable Shortening has 52 times more energy per unit of mass than Canned Tomato Juice with Salt, which is very high in comparison to other foods. Tomato Juice with Salt having very low energy density.
Discover which food has more nutrients per 100 calories - Tomato Juice with Salt or Composite Household Vegetable Shortening?
Tomato Juice With Salt VS Composite Household Vegetable Shortening Nutrients Per 100 Kcal
Discover which food has more nutrients per 100 calories - Tomato Juice with Salt or Composite Household Vegetable Shortening?
Lets compare vitamin content per 100 calories of Tomato Juice with Salt vs Composite Household Vegetable Shortening:
100 calories of Tomato Juice with Salt have more Vitamin A, 260 times more Vitamin B1, more Vitamin B2, more Vitamin B3, 3640 times more Vitamin B6, more Vitamin B9, more Vitamin C, 2.7 times more Vitamin E and 2.2 times more Vitamin K than Composite Household Vegetable Shortening.
100 calories of Composite Household Vegetable Shortening have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin B1, Vitamin B2, Vitamin B3, Vitamin B6, Vitamin B9 and Vitamin C
Both Canned Tomato Juice with Salt as well as Composite Household Vegetable Shortening have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D in 100 calories.
Comparing minerals per 100 calories for Tomato Juice with Salt vs Composite Household Vegetable Shortening:
100 calories of Tomato Juice with Salt have 520 times more Calcium, more Copper, 289.7 times more Iron, more Magnesium, more Manganese, more Phosphorus, more Potassium, more Selenium, 3289 times more Sodium, more Zinc and more Water than Composite Household Vegetable Shortening.
100 calories of Composite Household Vegetable Shortening lack sufficient amounts of Calcium, Copper, Iron, Magnesium, Manganese, Phosphorus, Potassium, Selenium and Zinc
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 100 calories:
100 calories of Tomato Juice with Salt have more Carbohydrate, more Sugars, more Fiber and more Protein than Composite Household Vegetable Shortening.
While 100 kcal of Composite Household Vegetable Shortening contain 6.6 times more Fat, 25.3 times more Saturated Fat, 7.2 times more Omega 3 and 22.9 times more Omega 6 than Canned Tomato Juice with Salt.
Both Tomato Juice with Salt and Composite Household Vegetable Shortening offer comparable quantities of Energy per 100 calories.
100 calories of Tomato Juice with Salt provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3 and Omega 6
100 calories of Composite Household Vegetable Shortening provide inadequate amounts of Carbohydrate, Fiber and Protein