Comparing Nutrients in 100 calories Tomatoes in Juice with SaltVS Composite Household Vegetable Shortening
Weight per 100 calories
Tomatoes in Juice with Salt
625g
Composite Household Vegetable Shortening
11.3g
Composite Household Vegetable Shortening has 55.3 times more energy per unit of mass than Canned Red Ripe Tomatoes in Tomato Juice with Salt, which is very high in comparison to other foods. Tomatoes in Juice with Salt having very low energy density.
Discover which food has more nutrients per 100 calories - Tomatoes in Juice with Salt or Composite Household Vegetable Shortening?
Tomatoes In Juice With Salt VS Composite Household Vegetable Shortening Nutrients Per 100 Kcal
Discover which food has more nutrients per 100 calories - Tomatoes in Juice with Salt or Composite Household Vegetable Shortening?
Lets compare vitamin content per 100 calories of Tomatoes in Juice with Salt vs Composite Household Vegetable Shortening:
100 calories of Tomatoes in Juice with Salt have more Vitamin A, 1588.4 times more Vitamin B1, more Vitamin B2, more Vitamin B3, 9.5 times more Vitamin B5, 6132.8 times more Vitamin B6, more Vitamin B9, more Vitamin C, 5.3 times more Vitamin E and 2.7 times more Vitamin K than Composite Household Vegetable Shortening.
100 calories of Composite Household Vegetable Shortening have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin B1, Vitamin B2, Vitamin B3, Vitamin B5, Vitamin B6, Vitamin B9 and Vitamin C
Both Canned Red Ripe Tomatoes in Tomato Juice with Salt as well as Composite Household Vegetable Shortening have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D in 100 calories.
Comparing minerals per 100 calories for Tomatoes in Juice with Salt vs Composite Household Vegetable Shortening:
100 calories of Tomatoes in Juice with Salt have 1823.3 times more Calcium, more Copper, 449.9 times more Iron, more Magnesium, more Manganese, more Phosphorus, more Potassium, more Selenium, 1588.4 times more Sodium, more Zinc and more Water than Composite Household Vegetable Shortening.
100 calories of Composite Household Vegetable Shortening lack sufficient amounts of Calcium, Copper, Iron, Magnesium, Manganese, Phosphorus, Potassium, Selenium and Zinc
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 100 calories:
100 calories of Tomatoes in Juice with Salt have more Carbohydrate, more Sugars, more Fiber and more Protein than Composite Household Vegetable Shortening.
While 100 kcal of Composite Household Vegetable Shortening contain 7.2 times more Fat, 13.3 times more Saturated Fat, 8.5 times more Omega 3 and 4.9 times more Omega 6 than Canned Red Ripe Tomatoes in Tomato Juice with Salt.
Both Tomatoes in Juice with Salt and Composite Household Vegetable Shortening offer comparable quantities of Energy per 100 calories.
100 calories of Tomatoes in Juice with Salt provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3
100 calories of Composite Household Vegetable Shortening provide inadequate amounts of Carbohydrate, Fiber and Protein