Comparing Nutrients in 300 calories Frozen Crinkle Cut French Fried Potatoes with SaltVS Muscat White Table Wine
Weight per 300 calories
Frozen Crinkle Cut French Fried Potatoes with Salt
206g
Muscat White Table Wine
366g
Frozen Crinkle Cut French Fried Potatoes with Salt have 1.8 times more energy per 100g than Muscat White Table Wine. It has average energy density when compared to other foods. Muscat White Table Wine having average energy density.
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Frozen Crinkle Cut French Fried Potatoes with Salt or Muscat White Table Wine?
Macros Ratio
ProteinFatCarbs
Frozen Crinkle Cut French Fried Potatoes with Salt
Frozen Crinkle Cut French Fried Potatoes With Salt VS Muscat White Table Wine Nutrients Per 300 Kcal
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Frozen Crinkle Cut French Fried Potatoes with Salt or Muscat White Table Wine?
Lets compare vitamin content per 300 calories of Frozen Crinkle Cut French Fried Potatoes with Salt vs Muscat White Table Wine:
Both Frozen Crinkle or Regular Cut French Fried Potatoes with Salt and Muscat White Table Wine have similar amounts of vitamins per 300 kcal
Comparing minerals per 300 calories for Frozen Crinkle Cut French Fried Potatoes with Salt vs Muscat White Table Wine:
300 kcal of Muscat White Table Wine contain 2.3 times more Water than Frozen Crinkle or Regular Cut French Fried Potatoes with Salt.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 300 calories:
300 calories of Frozen Crinkle Cut French Fried Potatoes with Salt have more Fat, 2.6 times more Carbohydrate and 18.8 times more Protein than Muscat White Table Wine.
Both Frozen Crinkle Cut French Fried Potatoes with Salt and Muscat White Table Wine offer comparable quantities of Energy per 300 calories.
300 calories of Muscat White Table Wine provide inadequate amounts of Protein