Comparing Nutrients in 300 calories Reduced Calorie French Salad DressingVS Cassava
Weight per 300 calories
Reduced Calorie French Salad Dressing
132g
Cassava
188g
Reduced Calorie French Salad Dressing has 1.4 times more energy per 100g than Cassava. It has above average energy density when compared to other foods. Raw Cassava having above average energy density.
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Reduced Calorie French Salad Dressing or Cassava?
Reduced Calorie French Salad Dressing VS Cassava Nutrients Per 300 Kcal
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Reduced Calorie French Salad Dressing or Cassava?
Lets compare vitamin content per 300 calories of Reduced Calorie French Salad Dressing vs Cassava:
300 calories of Reduced Calorie French Salad Dressing have 10.6 times more Vitamin E than Cassava.
While 300 kcal of Raw Cassava contain more Vitamin B1, more Vitamin B2, more Vitamin B3, more Vitamin B6, 19.2 times more Vitamin B9 and more Vitamin C than Reduced Calorie French Salad Dressing.
300 calories of Reduced Calorie French Salad Dressing have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B1, Vitamin B2, Vitamin B3, Vitamin B6, Vitamin B9 and Vitamin C
300 calories of Cassava have insufficient amounts of Vitamin E
Both Reduced Calorie French Salad Dressing as well as Raw Cassava have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin B5, Vitamin B12, Vitamin D and Vitamin K in 300 calories.
Comparing minerals per 300 calories for Reduced Calorie French Salad Dressing vs Cassava:
300 calories of Reduced Calorie French Salad Dressing have 40.5 times more Sodium than Cassava.
While 300 kcal of Raw Cassava contain 14.2 times more Copper, 3.3 times more Magnesium, 7.7 times more Manganese, 2.7 times more Phosphorus and 4.9 times more Potassium than Reduced Calorie French Salad Dressing.
Both Reduced Calorie French Salad Dressing and Cassava contain similar levels of Iron per 300 calories.
300 calories of Reduced Calorie French Salad Dressing lack sufficient amounts of Copper, Magnesium, Manganese, Phosphorus and Potassium
Both Reduced Calorie French Salad Dressing as well as Raw Cassava lack sufficient amounts of Calcium, Selenium and Zinc in 300 calories.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 300 calories:
300 calories of Reduced Calorie French Salad Dressing have 32.7 times more Fat, 17.8 times more Saturated Fat, 36.7 times more Omega 3, 146 times more Omega 6 and 10.7 times more Sugars than Cassava.
While 300 kcal of Raw Cassava contain 2 times more Carbohydrate and more Fiber than Reduced Calorie French Salad Dressing.
Both Reduced Calorie French Salad Dressing and Cassava offer comparable quantities of Energy per 300 calories.
300 calories of Reduced Calorie French Salad Dressing provide inadequate amounts of Fiber
300 calories of Cassava provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3 and Omega 6
Both Reduced Calorie French Salad Dressing as well as Raw Cassava provide inadequate amounts of Protein in 300 calories.