Composite Household Vegetable Shortening has 15.2 times more energy per 100g than Potato Skin. It has very high energy density when compared to other foods. Raw Potato Skin having low energy density.
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Composite Household Vegetable Shortening or Potato Skin?
Composite Household Vegetable Shortening VS Potato Skin Nutrients Per 300 Kcal
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Composite Household Vegetable Shortening or Potato Skin?
Lets compare vitamin content per 300 calories of Composite Household Vegetable Shortening vs Potato Skin:
300 kcal of Raw Potato Skin contain 16 times more Vitamin B1, more Vitamin B2, more Vitamin B3, 6.8 times more Vitamin B5, 3642.7 times more Vitamin B6, more Vitamin B9 and more Vitamin C than Composite Household Vegetable Shortening.
300 calories of Composite Household Vegetable Shortening have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B1, Vitamin B2, Vitamin B3, Vitamin B5, Vitamin B6, Vitamin B9 and Vitamin C
Both Composite Household Vegetable Shortening as well as Raw Potato Skin have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D in 300 calories.
Comparing minerals per 300 calories for Composite Household Vegetable Shortening vs Potato Skin:
300 kcal of Raw Potato Skin contain 457.2 times more Calcium, more Copper, 705.5 times more Iron, more Magnesium, more Manganese, more Phosphorus, more Potassium, more Zinc and more Water than Composite Household Vegetable Shortening.
300 calories of Composite Household Vegetable Shortening lack sufficient amounts of Calcium, Copper, Iron, Magnesium, Manganese, Phosphorus, Potassium and Zinc
Both Composite Household Vegetable Shortening as well as Raw Potato Skin lack sufficient amounts of Selenium in 300 calories.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 300 calories:
300 calories of Composite Household Vegetable Shortening have 65.6 times more Fat, 63 times more Saturated Fat, 12.4 times more Omega 3 and 53.7 times more Omega 6 than Potato Skin.
While 300 kcal of Raw Potato Skin contain more Carbohydrate, more Fiber and more Protein than Composite Household Vegetable Shortening.
Both Composite Household Vegetable Shortening and Potato Skin offer comparable quantities of Energy per 300 calories.
300 calories of Composite Household Vegetable Shortening provide inadequate amounts of Carbohydrate, Fiber and Protein
300 calories of Potato Skin provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3 and Omega 6