Nutrient Comparison: Canned Great Northern Beans VS Cassava per 100 g
Compare the macro and micronutrient content in 100 g of Canned Great Northern Beans versus 100 g of Cassava to make informed dietary choices. Explore their nutritional differences and benefits.
Lets compare vitamin content per 100 grams of Canned Great Northern Beans vs Cassava:
- 100 grams of Canned Great Northern Beans have 1.6 times more Vitamin B1, 1.3 times more Vitamin B2, 2.6 times more Vitamin B5, 1.2 times more Vitamin B6, 3 times more Vitamin B9, 4.2 times more Vitamin E and 1.6 times more Vitamin K than Cassava.
- While 100 g of Raw Cassava contain 1.9 times more Vitamin B3 and 15.8 times more Vitamin C than Canned Great Northern Beans.
- 100 grams of Canned Great Northern Beans have insufficient amounts of Vitamin C
- 100 grams of Cassava have insufficient amounts of Vitamin E and Vitamin K
- Both Canned Great Northern Beans as well as Raw Cassava have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D in 100 grams.
Comparing minerals per 100 grams for Canned Great Northern Beans vs Cassava:
- 100 grams of Canned Great Northern Beans have 3.3 times more Calcium, 1.6 times more Copper, 5.8 times more Iron, 2.4 times more Magnesium, 5 times more Phosphorus, 1.3 times more Potassium, 5.9 times more Selenium, 26.4 times more Sodium and 1.9 times more Zinc than Cassava.
- Both Canned Great Northern Beans and Cassava contain similar levels of Manganese per 100 grams.
- 100 grams of Cassava lack sufficient amounts of Calcium and Selenium
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 100 grams:
- 100 grams of Canned Great Northern Beans have 4.2 times more Omega 3, 2.7 times more Fiber and 5.4 times more Protein than Cassava.
- While 100 g of Raw Cassava contain 1.4 times more Energy and 1.8 times more Carbohydrate than Canned Great Northern Beans.
- 100 grams of Cassava provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3
- Both Canned Great Northern Beans as well as Raw Cassava provide inadequate amounts of Omega 6 in 100 grams.