Nutrient Comparison: Cassava VS Cooked Whole-wheat Pasta per 100 g
Compare the macro and micronutrient content in 100 g of Cassava versus 100 g of Cooked Whole-wheat Pasta to make informed dietary choices. Explore their nutritional differences and benefits.
Lets compare vitamin content per 100 grams of Cassava vs Cooked Whole-wheat Pasta:
- 100 grams of Cassava have 1.3 times more Vitamin B9 and more Vitamin C than Cooked Whole-wheat Pasta.
- While 100 g of Cooked Whole-wheat Pasta contain 1.8 times more Vitamin B1, 2.1 times more Vitamin B2, 3.7 times more Vitamin B3 and 2.5 times more Vitamin B5 than Raw Cassava.
- Both Cassava and Cooked Whole-wheat Pasta provide similar amounts of Vitamin B6 per 100 grams.
- 100 grams of Cooked Whole-wheat Pasta have insufficient amounts of Vitamin C
- Both Raw Cassava as well as Cooked Whole-wheat Pasta have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin B12, Vitamin D, Vitamin E and Vitamin K in 100 grams.
Comparing minerals per 100 grams for Cassava vs Cooked Whole-wheat Pasta:
- 100 grams of Cassava have 2.8 times more Potassium than Cooked Whole-wheat Pasta.
- While 100 g of Cooked Whole-wheat Pasta contain 2.3 times more Copper, 6.4 times more Iron, 2.6 times more Magnesium, 3.4 times more Manganese, 4.7 times more Phosphorus, 51.9 times more Selenium and 3.9 times more Zinc than Raw Cassava.
- 100 grams of Cassava lack sufficient amounts of Selenium
- Both Raw Cassava as well as Cooked Whole-wheat Pasta lack sufficient amounts of Calcium in 100 grams.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 100 grams:
- 100 grams of Cassava have 1.3 times more Carbohydrate and 2.3 times more Sugars than Cooked Whole-wheat Pasta.
- While 100 g of Cooked Whole-wheat Pasta contain 2.1 times more Omega 3, 16.8 times more Omega 6, 2.2 times more Fiber and 4.4 times more Protein than Raw Cassava.
- Both Cassava and Cooked Whole-wheat Pasta offer comparable quantities of Energy per 100 grams.
- 100 grams of Cassava provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3 and Omega 6