Nutrient Comparison: Cassava VS Hard Red Spring Wheat per 100 g
Compare the macro and micronutrient content in 100 g of Cassava versus 100 g of Hard Red Spring Wheat to make informed dietary choices. Explore their nutritional differences and benefits.
Lets compare vitamin content per 100 grams of Cassava vs Hard Red Spring Wheat:
- 100 grams of Cassava have more Vitamin C than Hard Red Spring Wheat.
- While 100 g of Hard Red Spring Wheat contain 5.8 times more Vitamin B1, 2.3 times more Vitamin B2, 6.7 times more Vitamin B3, 8.7 times more Vitamin B5, 3.8 times more Vitamin B6, 1.6 times more Vitamin B9 and 5.3 times more Vitamin E than Raw Cassava.
- 100 grams of Cassava have insufficient amounts of Vitamin E
- 100 grams of Hard Red Spring Wheat have insufficient amounts of Vitamin C
- Both Raw Cassava as well as Hard Red Spring Wheat have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin B12, Vitamin D and Vitamin K in 100 grams.
Comparing minerals per 100 grams for Cassava vs Hard Red Spring Wheat:
- 100 g of Hard Red Spring Wheat contain 1.6 times more Calcium, 4.1 times more Copper, 13.3 times more Iron, 5.9 times more Magnesium, 10.6 times more Manganese, 12.3 times more Phosphorus, 1.3 times more Potassium, 101 times more Selenium and 8.2 times more Zinc than Raw Cassava.
- 100 grams of Cassava lack sufficient amounts of Calcium and Selenium
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 100 grams:
- 100 grams of Cassava have 4.1 times more Sugars than Hard Red Spring Wheat.
- While 100 g of Hard Red Spring Wheat contain 2.1 times more Energy, 2.1 times more Omega 3, 22.7 times more Omega 6, 1.8 times more Carbohydrate, 6.8 times more Fiber and 11.3 times more Protein than Raw Cassava.
- 100 grams of Cassava provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3 and Omega 6