Nutrient Comparison: Composite Household Vegetable Shortening VS Tomato Juice with Salt per 100 g
Compare the macro and micronutrient content in 100 g of Composite Household Vegetable Shortening versus 100 g of Tomato Juice with Salt to make informed dietary choices. Explore their nutritional differences and benefits.
Lets compare vitamin content per 100 grams of Composite Household Vegetable Shortening vs Tomato Juice with Salt:
- 100 grams of Composite Household Vegetable Shortening have 19.2 times more Vitamin E and 23.1 times more Vitamin K than Tomato Juice with Salt.
- While 100 g of Canned Tomato Juice with Salt contain more Vitamin A, 5 times more Vitamin B1, more Vitamin B2, more Vitamin B3, 70 times more Vitamin B6, more Vitamin B9 and more Vitamin C than Composite Household Vegetable Shortening.
- 100 grams of Composite Household Vegetable Shortening have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin B1, Vitamin B2, Vitamin B3, Vitamin B6, Vitamin B9 and Vitamin C
- 100 grams of Tomato Juice with Salt have insufficient amounts of Vitamin K
- Both Composite Household Vegetable Shortening as well as Canned Tomato Juice with Salt have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D in 100 grams.
Comparing minerals per 100 grams for Composite Household Vegetable Shortening vs Tomato Juice with Salt:
- 100 g of Canned Tomato Juice with Salt contain more Copper, 5.6 times more Iron, more Magnesium, more Manganese, more Phosphorus, more Potassium, 63.3 times more Sodium and more Water than Composite Household Vegetable Shortening.
- 100 grams of Composite Household Vegetable Shortening lack sufficient amounts of Copper, Iron, Magnesium, Manganese, Phosphorus and Potassium
- Both Composite Household Vegetable Shortening as well as Canned Tomato Juice with Salt lack sufficient amounts of Calcium, Selenium and Zinc in 100 grams.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 100 grams:
- 100 grams of Composite Household Vegetable Shortening have 52 times more Energy, 344.7 times more Fat, 1314.7 times more Saturated Fat, 376.6 times more Omega 3 and 1191.5 times more Omega 6 than Tomato Juice with Salt.
- While 100 g of Canned Tomato Juice with Salt contain more Carbohydrate and more Sugars than Composite Household Vegetable Shortening.
- 100 grams of Composite Household Vegetable Shortening provide inadequate amounts of Carbohydrate
- 100 grams of Tomato Juice with Salt provide inadequate amounts of Energy, Omega 3 and Omega 6
- Both Composite Household Vegetable Shortening as well as Canned Tomato Juice with Salt provide inadequate amounts of Fiber and Protein in 100 grams.