Comparing Nutrients in 100 calories BananasVS Composite Household Vegetable Shortening
Weight per 100 calories
Bananas
112g
Composite Household Vegetable Shortening
11.3g
Composite Household Vegetable Shortening has 9.9 times more energy per unit of mass than Raw Bananas, which is very high in comparison to other foods. Bananas having average energy density.
Discover which food has more nutrients per 100 calories - Bananas or Composite Household Vegetable Shortening?
Bananas VS Composite Household Vegetable Shortening Nutrients Per 100 Kcal
Discover which food has more nutrients per 100 calories - Bananas or Composite Household Vegetable Shortening?
Lets compare vitamin content per 100 calories of Bananas vs Composite Household Vegetable Shortening:
100 calories of Bananas have 15.4 times more Vitamin B1, more Vitamin B2, more Vitamin B3, 4.9 times more Vitamin B5, 3645.3 times more Vitamin B6, more Vitamin B9 and more Vitamin C than Composite Household Vegetable Shortening.
While 100 kcal of Composite Household Vegetable Shortening contain 6.2 times more Vitamin E and 10.7 times more Vitamin K than Raw Bananas.
100 calories of Bananas have insufficient amounts of Vitamin E and Vitamin K
100 calories of Composite Household Vegetable Shortening have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B1, Vitamin B2, Vitamin B3, Vitamin B5, Vitamin B6, Vitamin B9 and Vitamin C
Both Raw Bananas as well as Composite Household Vegetable Shortening have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D in 100 calories.
Comparing minerals per 100 calories for Bananas vs Composite Household Vegetable Shortening:
100 calories of Bananas have more Copper, 36.9 times more Iron, more Magnesium, more Manganese, more Phosphorus, more Potassium, more Selenium and more Water than Composite Household Vegetable Shortening.
100 calories of Composite Household Vegetable Shortening lack sufficient amounts of Copper, Iron, Magnesium, Manganese, Phosphorus, Potassium and Selenium
Both Raw Bananas as well as Composite Household Vegetable Shortening lack sufficient amounts of Calcium and Zinc in 100 calories.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 100 calories:
100 calories of Bananas have more Carbohydrate, more Sugars, more Fiber and more Protein than Composite Household Vegetable Shortening.
While 100 kcal of Composite Household Vegetable Shortening contain 30.5 times more Fat, 22.5 times more Saturated Fat, 7 times more Omega 3 and 57.4 times more Omega 6 than Raw Bananas.
Both Bananas and Composite Household Vegetable Shortening offer comparable quantities of Energy per 100 calories.
100 calories of Bananas provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3 and Omega 6
100 calories of Composite Household Vegetable Shortening provide inadequate amounts of Carbohydrate, Fiber and Protein