Comparing Nutrients in 300 calories AcerolaVS Dried Beechnuts
Weight per 300 calories
Acerola
938g
Dried Beechnuts
52g
Dried Beechnuts have 18 times more energy per unit of mass than Raw Acerola, which is very high in comparison to other foods. Acerola having low energy density.
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Acerola or Dried Beechnuts?
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Acerola or Dried Beechnuts?
Lets compare vitamin content per 300 calories of Acerola vs Dried Beechnuts:
300 calories of Acerola have more Vitamin A, 2.9 times more Vitamin B2, 8.2 times more Vitamin B3, 6 times more Vitamin B5, 2.2 times more Vitamin B9 and 1948.2 times more Vitamin C than Dried Beechnuts.
While 300 kcal of Dried Beechnuts contain 4.2 times more Vitamin B6 than Raw Acerola.
Both Acerola and Dried Beechnuts provide similar amounts of Vitamin B1 per 300 calories.
300 calories of Dried Beechnuts have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A and Vitamin B3
Both Raw Acerola as well as Dried Beechnuts have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B12 in 300 calories.
Comparing minerals per 300 calories for Acerola vs Dried Beechnuts:
300 calories of Acerola have 216 times more Calcium, 2.3 times more Copper, 1.5 times more Iron, more Magnesium, more Phosphorus, 2.6 times more Potassium, 5 times more Zinc and 249.3 times more Water than Dried Beechnuts.
300 calories of Dried Beechnuts lack sufficient amounts of Calcium, Magnesium, Phosphorus and Zinc
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 300 calories:
300 calories of Acerola have 4.1 times more Carbohydrate than Dried Beechnuts.
While 300 kcal of Dried Beechnuts contain 9.3 times more Fat, 4.7 times more Saturated Fat, 2.1 times more Omega 3 and 22.2 times more Omega 6 than Raw Acerola.
Both Acerola and Dried Beechnuts offer comparable quantities of Energy per 300 calories.
300 calories of Acerola provide inadequate amounts of Omega 6
300 calories of Dried Beechnuts provide inadequate amounts of Protein