Comparing Nutrients in 300 calories CassavaVS Archway Home Style Cookies, Old Fashioned Windmill Cookies
Weight per 300 calories
Cassava
188g
Archway Home Style Cookies, Old Fashioned Windmill Cookies
64g
Archway Home Style Cookies, Old Fashioned Windmill Cookies have 2.9 times more energy per unit of mass than Raw Cassava, which is very high in comparison to other foods. Cassava having above average energy density.
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Cassava or Archway Home Style Cookies, Old Fashioned Windmill Cookies?
Macros Ratio
ProteinFatCarbs
Cassava
3%
2%
95%
Archway Home Style Cookies, Old Fashioned Windmill Cookies
Cassava VS Archway Home Style Cookies, Old Fashioned Windmill Cookies Nutrients Per 300 Kcal
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Cassava or Archway Home Style Cookies, Old Fashioned Windmill Cookies?
Lets compare vitamin content per 300 calories of Cassava vs Archway Home Style Cookies, Old Fashioned Windmill Cookies:
300 calories of Cassava have more Vitamin C than Archway Home Style Cookies, Old Fashioned Windmill Cookies.
While 300 kcal of Archway Home Style Cookies, Old Fashioned Windmill Cookies contain 1.3 times more Vitamin B1 and 1.8 times more Vitamin B2 than Raw Cassava.
Both Cassava and Archway Home Style Cookies, Old Fashioned Windmill Cookies provide similar amounts of Vitamin B3 and Vitamin B9 per 300 calories.
300 calories of Archway Home Style Cookies, Old Fashioned Windmill Cookies have insufficient amounts of Vitamin C
Comparing minerals per 300 calories for Cassava vs Archway Home Style Cookies, Old Fashioned Windmill Cookies:
300 calories of Cassava have 7 times more Potassium than Archway Home Style Cookies, Old Fashioned Windmill Cookies.
While 300 kcal of Archway Home Style Cookies, Old Fashioned Windmill Cookies contain 3.9 times more Iron and 11.5 times more Sodium than Raw Cassava.
300 calories of Archway Home Style Cookies, Old Fashioned Windmill Cookies lack sufficient amounts of Potassium
Both Raw Cassava as well as Archway Home Style Cookies, Old Fashioned Windmill Cookies lack sufficient amounts of Calcium in 300 calories.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 300 calories:
300 calories of Cassava have 1.5 times more Carbohydrate and 2.9 times more Fiber than Archway Home Style Cookies, Old Fashioned Windmill Cookies.
While 300 kcal of Archway Home Style Cookies, Old Fashioned Windmill Cookies contain 21.4 times more Fat, 17.3 times more Saturated Fat and 6.6 times more Sugars than Raw Cassava.
Both Cassava and Archway Home Style Cookies, Old Fashioned Windmill Cookies offer comparable quantities of Energy per 300 calories.
300 calories of Archway Home Style Cookies, Old Fashioned Windmill Cookies provide inadequate amounts of Fiber
Both Raw Cassava as well as Archway Home Style Cookies, Old Fashioned Windmill Cookies provide inadequate amounts of Protein in 300 calories.