Comparing Nutrients in 300 calories CassavaVS Composite Household Vegetable Shortening
Weight per 300 calories
Cassava
188g
Composite Household Vegetable Shortening
34g
Composite Household Vegetable Shortening has 5.5 times more energy per unit of mass than Raw Cassava, which is very high in comparison to other foods. Cassava having above average energy density.
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Cassava or Composite Household Vegetable Shortening?
Cassava VS Composite Household Vegetable Shortening Nutrients Per 300 Kcal
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Cassava or Composite Household Vegetable Shortening?
Lets compare vitamin content per 300 calories of Cassava vs Composite Household Vegetable Shortening:
300 calories of Cassava have 24 times more Vitamin B1, more Vitamin B2, more Vitamin B3, 486.2 times more Vitamin B6, more Vitamin B9 and more Vitamin C than Composite Household Vegetable Shortening.
While 300 kcal of Composite Household Vegetable Shortening contain 5.8 times more Vitamin E and 5.1 times more Vitamin K than Raw Cassava.
300 calories of Cassava have insufficient amounts of Vitamin E and Vitamin K
300 calories of Composite Household Vegetable Shortening have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B1, Vitamin B2, Vitamin B3, Vitamin B6, Vitamin B9 and Vitamin C
Both Raw Cassava as well as Composite Household Vegetable Shortening have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin B5, Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D in 300 calories.
Comparing minerals per 300 calories for Cassava vs Composite Household Vegetable Shortening:
300 calories of Cassava have more Copper, 21.3 times more Iron, more Magnesium, more Manganese, more Phosphorus and more Potassium than Composite Household Vegetable Shortening.
300 calories of Composite Household Vegetable Shortening lack sufficient amounts of Copper, Iron, Magnesium, Manganese, Phosphorus and Potassium
Both Raw Cassava as well as Composite Household Vegetable Shortening lack sufficient amounts of Calcium, Selenium and Zinc in 300 calories.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 300 calories:
300 calories of Cassava have more Carbohydrate and more Fiber than Composite Household Vegetable Shortening.
While 300 kcal of Composite Household Vegetable Shortening contain 64.6 times more Fat, 61.1 times more Saturated Fat, 20 times more Omega 3 and 148.3 times more Omega 6 than Raw Cassava.
Both Cassava and Composite Household Vegetable Shortening offer comparable quantities of Energy per 300 calories.
300 calories of Cassava provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3 and Omega 6
300 calories of Composite Household Vegetable Shortening provide inadequate amounts of Carbohydrate and Fiber
Both Raw Cassava as well as Composite Household Vegetable Shortening provide inadequate amounts of Protein in 300 calories.