Comparing Nutrients in 300 calories Chewing gumVS Frozen Crinkle Cut French Fried Potatoes with Salt
Weight per 300 calories
Chewing gum
83.3g
Frozen Crinkle Cut French Fried Potatoes with Salt
206g
Chewing gum has 2.5 times more energy per 100g than Frozen Crinkle Cut French Fried Potatoes with Salt. It has high energy density when compared to other foods. Frozen Crinkle or Regular Cut French Fried Potatoes with Salt having average energy density.
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Chewing gum or Frozen Crinkle Cut French Fried Potatoes with Salt?
Macros Ratio
ProteinFatCarbs
Chewing gum
0%
1%
99%
Frozen Crinkle Cut French Fried Potatoes with Salt
Chewing Gum VS Frozen Crinkle Cut French Fried Potatoes With Salt Nutrients Per 300 Kcal
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Chewing gum or Frozen Crinkle Cut French Fried Potatoes with Salt?
Lets compare vitamin content per 300 calories of Chewing gum vs Frozen Crinkle Cut French Fried Potatoes with Salt:
300 kcal of Frozen Crinkle or Regular Cut French Fried Potatoes with Salt contain more Vitamin B1, more Vitamin B3, more Vitamin B5, more Vitamin B6, more Vitamin B9 and more Vitamin C than Chewing gum.
300 calories of Chewing gum have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B1, Vitamin B3, Vitamin B5, Vitamin B6, Vitamin B9 and Vitamin C
Both Chewing gum as well as Frozen Crinkle or Regular Cut French Fried Potatoes with Salt have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin B2, Vitamin B12, Vitamin D, Vitamin E and Vitamin K in 300 calories.
Comparing minerals per 300 calories for Chewing gum vs Frozen Crinkle Cut French Fried Potatoes with Salt:
300 kcal of Frozen Crinkle or Regular Cut French Fried Potatoes with Salt contain more Copper, more Iron, more Magnesium, more Manganese, more Phosphorus, 468.5 times more Potassium, 860.5 times more Sodium and more Zinc than Chewing gum.
300 calories of Chewing gum lack sufficient amounts of Copper, Iron, Magnesium, Manganese, Phosphorus, Potassium and Zinc
Both Chewing gum as well as Frozen Crinkle or Regular Cut French Fried Potatoes with Salt lack sufficient amounts of Calcium and Selenium in 300 calories.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 300 calories:
300 calories of Chewing gum have 1.6 times more Carbohydrate and 127.6 times more Sugars than Frozen Crinkle Cut French Fried Potatoes with Salt.
While 300 kcal of Frozen Crinkle or Regular Cut French Fried Potatoes with Salt contain 41 times more Fat, 73.3 times more Saturated Fat, 2.1 times more Fiber and more Protein than Chewing gum.
Both Chewing gum and Frozen Crinkle Cut French Fried Potatoes with Salt offer comparable quantities of Energy per 300 calories.
300 calories of Chewing gum provide inadequate amounts of Fiber and Protein
Both Chewing gum as well as Frozen Crinkle or Regular Cut French Fried Potatoes with Salt provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3 and Omega 6 in 300 calories.