Comparing Nutrients in 300 calories Mung BeansVS Tomato Paste
Weight per 300 calories
Mung Beans
86.5g
Tomato Paste
366g
Mung Beans have 4.2 times more energy per 100g than Tomato Paste. It has high energy density when compared to other foods. Canned Tomato Paste having average energy density.
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Mung Beans or Tomato Paste?
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Mung Beans or Tomato Paste?
Lets compare vitamin content per 300 calories of Mung Beans vs Tomato Paste:
300 calories of Mung Beans have 2.4 times more Vitamin B1, 3.2 times more Vitamin B5 and 12.3 times more Vitamin B9 than Tomato Paste.
While 300 kcal of Canned Tomato Paste contain 53.6 times more Vitamin A, 2.8 times more Vitamin B2, 5.8 times more Vitamin B3, 2.4 times more Vitamin B6, 19.3 times more Vitamin C, 35.7 times more Vitamin E and 5.4 times more Vitamin K than Raw Mung Beans.
300 calories of Mung Beans have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin C and Vitamin E
Both Raw Mung Beans as well as Canned Tomato Paste have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D in 300 calories.
Comparing minerals per 300 calories for Mung Beans vs Tomato Paste:
300 kcal of Canned Tomato Paste contain 1.6 times more Copper, 1.9 times more Iron, 3.4 times more Potassium, 2.7 times more Selenium, 16.6 times more Sodium and 34.4 times more Water than Raw Mung Beans.
Both Mung Beans and Tomato Paste contain similar levels of Calcium, Magnesium, Manganese, Phosphorus and Zinc per 300 calories.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 300 calories:
300 calories of Mung Beans have 1.3 times more Protein than Tomato Paste.
While 300 kcal of Canned Tomato Paste contain 1.3 times more Carbohydrate and 7.8 times more Sugars than Raw Mung Beans.
Both Mung Beans and Tomato Paste offer comparable quantities of Energy and Fiber per 300 calories.
Both Raw Mung Beans as well as Canned Tomato Paste provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3 and Omega 6 in 300 calories.