Comparing Nutrients in 300 calories Roasted AlmondsVS SILK Chocolate, soymilk
Weight per 300 calories
Roasted Almonds
50.2g
SILK Chocolate, soymilk
517g
Roasted Almonds have 10.3 times more energy per 100g than SILK Chocolate, soymilk. It has very high energy density when compared to other foods. SILK Chocolate, soymilk having low energy density.
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Roasted Almonds or SILK Chocolate, soymilk?
Roasted Almonds VS SILK Chocolate, Soymilk Nutrients Per 300 Kcal
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Roasted Almonds or SILK Chocolate, soymilk?
Lets compare vitamin content per 300 calories of Roasted Almonds vs SILK Chocolate, soymilk:
300 kcal of SILK Chocolate, soymilk contain 1.8 times more Vitamin B2, 1.9 times more Vitamin B9, more Vitamin B12 and more Vitamin D than Dry Roasted Almonds.
300 calories of Roasted Almonds have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D
Both Dry Roasted Almonds as well as SILK Chocolate, soymilk have insufficient amounts of Vitamin C in 300 calories.
Comparing minerals per 300 calories for Roasted Almonds vs SILK Chocolate, soymilk:
300 calories of Roasted Almonds have 1.7 times more Magnesium and 1.3 times more Zinc than SILK Chocolate, soymilk.
While 300 kcal of SILK Chocolate, soymilk contain 4.7 times more Calcium, 1.6 times more Iron, 2.1 times more Potassium, 8.8 times more Selenium, 140.9 times more Sodium and 369.6 times more Water than Dry Roasted Almonds.
300 calories of Roasted Almonds lack sufficient amounts of Selenium
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 300 calories:
300 calories of Roasted Almonds have 3.5 times more Fat, 1.9 times more Saturated Fat and 1.3 times more Fiber than SILK Chocolate, soymilk.
While 300 kcal of SILK Chocolate, soymilk contain 4.6 times more Carbohydrate and 16.6 times more Sugars than Dry Roasted Almonds.
Both Roasted Almonds and SILK Chocolate, soymilk offer comparable quantities of Energy and Protein per 300 calories.