Comparing Nutrients in 300 calories Plums, canned, purple, water pack, solids and liquidsVS Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin
Weight per 300 calories
Plums, canned, purple, water pack, solids and liquids
732g
Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin
345g
Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin without Salt has 2.1 times more energy per unit of mass than Plums, canned, purple, water pack, solids and liquids, which is average in comparison to other foods. Plums, canned, purple, water pack, solids and liquids having low energy density.
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Plums, canned, purple, water pack, solids and liquids or Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin?
Macros Ratio
ProteinFatCarbs
Plums, canned, purple, water pack, solids and liquids
Plums, Canned, Purple, Water Pack, Solids And Liquids VS Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin Nutrients Per 300 Kcal
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Plums, canned, purple, water pack, solids and liquids or Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin?
Lets compare vitamin content per 300 calories of Plums, canned, purple, water pack, solids and liquids vs Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin:
300 calories of Plums, canned, purple, water pack, solids and liquids have more Vitamin A, 4.4 times more Vitamin B2, 38.2 times more Vitamin E and 4.1 times more Vitamin K than Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin.
While 300 kcal of Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin without Salt contain 2.4 times more Vitamin B1, 1.8 times more Vitamin B3, 3.4 times more Vitamin B5, 5.2 times more Vitamin B6, 1.6 times more Vitamin B9 and 2.3 times more Vitamin C than Plums, canned, purple, water pack, solids and liquids.
300 calories of Plums, canned, purple, water pack, solids and liquids have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B9
300 calories of Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin B2 and Vitamin E
Both Plums, canned, purple, water pack, solids and liquids as well as Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin without Salt have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D in 300 calories.
Comparing minerals per 300 calories for Plums, canned, purple, water pack, solids and liquids vs Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin:
300 calories of Plums, canned, purple, water pack, solids and liquids have 2.4 times more Water than Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin.
While 300 kcal of Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin without Salt contain 2.3 times more Copper, 2.1 times more Magnesium, 2 times more Manganese, 1.6 times more Phosphorus, 1.4 times more Potassium and 1.8 times more Zinc than Plums, canned, purple, water pack, solids and liquids.
Both Plums, canned, purple, water pack, solids and liquids and Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin contain similar levels of Iron per 300 calories.
300 calories of Plums, canned, purple, water pack, solids and liquids lack sufficient amounts of Zinc
Both Plums, canned, purple, water pack, solids and liquids as well as Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin without Salt lack sufficient amounts of Calcium and Selenium in 300 calories.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 300 calories:
300 calories of Plums, canned, purple, water pack, solids and liquids have 23.6 times more Sugars than Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin.
While 300 kcal of Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin without Salt contain 2.3 times more Protein than Plums, canned, purple, water pack, solids and liquids.
Both Plums, canned, purple, water pack, solids and liquids and Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin offer comparable quantities of Energy, Carbohydrate and Fiber per 300 calories.
300 calories of Plums, canned, purple, water pack, solids and liquids provide inadequate amounts of Protein
Both Plums, canned, purple, water pack, solids and liquids as well as Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin without Salt provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3 and Omega 6 in 300 calories.