Comparing Nutrients in 300 calories Sweet and Sour Salad DressingVS Meatless Luncheon Slices
Weight per 300 calories
Sweet and Sour Salad Dressing
2000g
Meatless Luncheon Slices
159g
Meatless Luncheon Slices have 12.6 times more energy per unit of mass than Sweet and Sour Salad Dressing, which is above average in comparison to other foods. Sweet and Sour Salad Dressing having very low energy density.
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Sweet and Sour Salad Dressing or Meatless Luncheon Slices?
Sweet And Sour Salad Dressing VS Meatless Luncheon Slices Nutrients Per 300 Kcal
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Sweet and Sour Salad Dressing or Meatless Luncheon Slices?
Lets compare vitamin content per 300 calories of Sweet and Sour Salad Dressing vs Meatless Luncheon Slices:
300 calories of Sweet and Sour Salad Dressing have more Vitamin C, 10.8 times more Vitamin E and more Vitamin K than Meatless Luncheon Slices.
While 300 kcal of Meatless Luncheon Slices contain 31.7 times more Vitamin B1, more Vitamin B2, 14.7 times more Vitamin B3, 7.1 times more Vitamin B6, 4 times more Vitamin B9 and more Vitamin B12 than Sweet and Sour Salad Dressing.
300 calories of Sweet and Sour Salad Dressing have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B2 and Vitamin B12
300 calories of Meatless Luncheon Slices have insufficient amounts of Vitamin C and Vitamin K
Both Sweet and Sour Salad Dressing as well as Meatless Luncheon Slices have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A and Vitamin D in 300 calories.
Comparing minerals per 300 calories for Sweet and Sour Salad Dressing vs Meatless Luncheon Slices:
300 calories of Sweet and Sour Salad Dressing have 1.2 times more Calcium, 1.6 times more Magnesium, 2.1 times more Potassium, 2.7 times more Selenium, 3.7 times more Sodium and 18.5 times more Water than Meatless Luncheon Slices.
While 300 kcal of Meatless Luncheon Slices contain 7.2 times more Copper, 3.6 times more Iron, 11.7 times more Phosphorus and 6.3 times more Zinc than Sweet and Sour Salad Dressing.
300 calories of Sweet and Sour Salad Dressing lack sufficient amounts of Zinc
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 300 calories:
300 calories of Sweet and Sour Salad Dressing have 10.5 times more Carbohydrate and 21 times more Sugars than Meatless Luncheon Slices.
While 300 kcal of Meatless Luncheon Slices contain more Fat, more Saturated Fat, more Omega 3, more Omega 6 and 14.1 times more Protein than Sweet and Sour Salad Dressing.
Both Sweet and Sour Salad Dressing and Meatless Luncheon Slices offer comparable quantities of Energy per 300 calories.
300 calories of Sweet and Sour Salad Dressing provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3, Omega 6 and Protein
300 calories of Meatless Luncheon Slices provide inadequate amounts of Carbohydrate
Both Sweet and Sour Salad Dressing as well as Meatless Luncheon Slices provide inadequate amounts of Fiber in 300 calories.