Comparing Nutrients in 500 calories Composite Household Vegetable ShorteningVS Canned Tomatoes with Green Chilies
Weight per 500 calories
Composite Household Vegetable Shortening
56.6g
Canned Tomatoes with Green Chilies
3333g
Composite Household Vegetable Shortening has 58.9 times more energy per 100g than Canned Tomatoes with Green Chilies. It has very high energy density when compared to other foods. Canned Red Ripe Tomatoes with Green Chilies having very low energy density.
Discover which food has more nutrients per 500 calories - Composite Household Vegetable Shortening or Canned Tomatoes with Green Chilies?
Composite Household Vegetable Shortening VS Canned Tomatoes With Green Chilies Nutrients Per 500 Kcal
Discover which food has more nutrients per 500 calories - Composite Household Vegetable Shortening or Canned Tomatoes with Green Chilies?
Lets compare vitamin content per 500 calories of Composite Household Vegetable Shortening vs Canned Tomatoes with Green Chilies:
500 kcal of Canned Red Ripe Tomatoes with Green Chilies contain more Vitamin A, 100.2 times more Vitamin B1, more Vitamin B2, more Vitamin B3, 12.8 times more Vitamin B5, 6070.1 times more Vitamin B6, more Vitamin B9 and more Vitamin C than Composite Household Vegetable Shortening.
500 calories of Composite Household Vegetable Shortening have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin B1, Vitamin B2, Vitamin B3, Vitamin B5, Vitamin B6, Vitamin B9 and Vitamin C
Both Composite Household Vegetable Shortening as well as Canned Red Ripe Tomatoes with Green Chilies have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D in 500 calories.
Comparing minerals per 500 calories for Composite Household Vegetable Shortening vs Canned Tomatoes with Green Chilies:
500 kcal of Canned Red Ripe Tomatoes with Green Chilies contain 1178.7 times more Calcium, more Copper, 218.9 times more Iron, more Magnesium, more Manganese, more Phosphorus, more Potassium, more Selenium, 5908.1 times more Sodium, more Zinc and more Water than Composite Household Vegetable Shortening.
500 calories of Composite Household Vegetable Shortening lack sufficient amounts of Calcium, Copper, Iron, Magnesium, Manganese, Phosphorus, Potassium, Selenium and Zinc
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 500 calories:
500 calories of Composite Household Vegetable Shortening have 21.2 times more Fat, 38.5 times more Saturated Fat, 32 times more Omega 3 and 15.3 times more Omega 6 than Canned Tomatoes with Green Chilies.
While 500 kcal of Canned Red Ripe Tomatoes with Green Chilies contain more Carbohydrate and more Protein than Composite Household Vegetable Shortening.
Both Composite Household Vegetable Shortening and Canned Tomatoes with Green Chilies offer comparable quantities of Energy per 500 calories.
500 calories of Composite Household Vegetable Shortening provide inadequate amounts of Carbohydrate and Protein
500 calories of Canned Tomatoes with Green Chilies provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3 and Omega 6