Nutrient Comparison: Boiled California Red Kidney Beans VS Linoleic Safflower Oil per 100 g
Compare the macro and micronutrient content in 100 g of Boiled California Red Kidney Beans versus 100 g of Linoleic Safflower Oil to make informed dietary choices. Explore their nutritional differences and benefits.
Lets compare vitamin content per 100 grams of Boiled California Red Kidney Beans vs Linoleic Safflower Oil:
- 100 grams of Boiled California Red Kidney Beans have more Vitamin B1, more Vitamin B2, more Vitamin B3, more Vitamin B5, more Vitamin B6 and more Vitamin B9 than Linoleic Safflower Oil.
- 100 grams of Linoleic Safflower Oil have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B1, Vitamin B2, Vitamin B3, Vitamin B5, Vitamin B6 and Vitamin B9
- Both Boiled California Red Kidney Beans as well as Linoleic Salad or Cooking Safflower Oil have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin B12 and Vitamin C in 100 grams.
Comparing minerals per 100 grams for Boiled California Red Kidney Beans vs Linoleic Safflower Oil:
- 100 grams of Boiled California Red Kidney Beans have more Calcium, more Copper, more Iron, more Magnesium, more Phosphorus, more Potassium, more Selenium and more Zinc than Linoleic Safflower Oil.
- 100 grams of Linoleic Safflower Oil lack sufficient amounts of Calcium, Copper, Iron, Magnesium, Phosphorus, Potassium, Selenium and Zinc
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 100 grams:
- 100 grams of Boiled California Red Kidney Beans have more Omega 3, more Carbohydrate, more Fiber and more Protein than Linoleic Safflower Oil.
- While 100 g of Linoleic Salad or Cooking Safflower Oil contain 7.1 times more Energy, 1111.1 times more Fat, 443.1 times more Saturated Fat and 3731.2 times more Omega 6 than Boiled California Red Kidney Beans.
- 100 grams of Boiled California Red Kidney Beans provide inadequate amounts of Omega 6
- 100 grams of Linoleic Safflower Oil provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3, Carbohydrate, Fiber and Protein