Nutrient Comparison: Canned Butterbur VS Royal Red Kidney Beans per 100 g
Compare the macro and micronutrient content in 100 g of Canned Butterbur versus 100 g of Royal Red Kidney Beans to make informed dietary choices. Explore their nutritional differences and benefits.
Lets compare vitamin content per 100 grams of Canned Butterbur vs Royal Red Kidney Beans:
- 100 grams of Canned Butterbur have 2.6 times more Vitamin C than Royal Red Kidney Beans.
- While 100 g of Raw Royal Red Kidney Beans contain 65 times more Vitamin B1, 40 times more Vitamin B2, 15 times more Vitamin B3, 70.8 times more Vitamin B5, 12 times more Vitamin B6 and 131 times more Vitamin B9 than Canned Butterbur.
- 100 grams of Canned Butterbur have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B1, Vitamin B2, Vitamin B3, Vitamin B5 and Vitamin B9
- Both Canned Butterbur as well as Raw Royal Red Kidney Beans have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D in 100 grams.
Comparing minerals per 100 grams for Canned Butterbur vs Royal Red Kidney Beans:
- 100 grams of Canned Butterbur have 8.2 times more Water than Royal Red Kidney Beans.
- While 100 g of Raw Royal Red Kidney Beans contain 3.9 times more Calcium, 27 times more Copper, 13.8 times more Iron, 69 times more Magnesium, 11.3 times more Manganese, 101.5 times more Phosphorus, 112.2 times more Potassium, 3.6 times more Selenium and 44.3 times more Zinc than Canned Butterbur.
- 100 grams of Canned Butterbur lack sufficient amounts of Magnesium, Phosphorus, Potassium, Selenium and Zinc
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 100 grams:
- 100 g of Raw Royal Red Kidney Beans contain 109.7 times more Energy, 153.5 times more Carbohydrate and 230.3 times more Protein than Canned Butterbur.
- 100 grams of Canned Butterbur provide inadequate amounts of Energy, Carbohydrate and Protein