Nutrient Comparison: Sugar VS Baked Potato Flesh per 100 g
Compare the macro and micronutrient content in 100 g of Sugar versus 100 g of Baked Potato Flesh to make informed dietary choices. Explore their nutritional differences and benefits.
Lets compare vitamin content per 100 grams of Sugar vs Baked Potato Flesh:
- 100 g of Baked Potatoes Flesh no Salt contain more Vitamin B1, more Vitamin B3, more Vitamin B5, more Vitamin B6, more Vitamin B9 and more Vitamin C than Sugars, white granulated.
- 100 grams of Sugar have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B1, Vitamin B3, Vitamin B5, Vitamin B6, Vitamin B9 and Vitamin C
- Both Sugars, white granulated as well as Baked Potatoes Flesh no Salt have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin B2, Vitamin B12, Vitamin D, Vitamin E and Vitamin K in 100 grams.
Comparing minerals per 100 grams for Sugar vs Baked Potato Flesh:
- 100 g of Baked Potatoes Flesh no Salt contain 30.7 times more Copper, 7 times more Iron, more Magnesium, 40.3 times more Manganese, more Phosphorus, 195.5 times more Potassium, 29 times more Zinc and 3771 times more Water than Sugars, white granulated.
- 100 grams of Sugar lack sufficient amounts of Copper, Iron, Magnesium, Manganese, Phosphorus, Potassium and Zinc
- Both Sugars, white granulated as well as Baked Potatoes Flesh no Salt lack sufficient amounts of Calcium and Selenium in 100 grams.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 100 grams:
- 100 grams of Sugar have 4.2 times more Energy, 4.6 times more Carbohydrate and 58.7 times more Sugars than Baked Potato Flesh.
- While 100 g of Baked Potatoes Flesh no Salt contain more Fiber and more Protein than Sugars, white granulated.
- 100 grams of Sugar provide inadequate amounts of Fiber and Protein
- Both Sugars, white granulated as well as Baked Potatoes Flesh no Salt provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3 and Omega 6 in 100 grams.