Nutrient Comparison: Wheat Bran VS Baked Potato Flesh per 100 g
Compare the macro and micronutrient content in 100 g of Wheat Bran versus 100 g of Baked Potato Flesh to make informed dietary choices. Explore their nutritional differences and benefits.
Lets compare vitamin content per 100 grams of Wheat Bran vs Baked Potato Flesh:
- 100 grams of Wheat Bran have 5 times more Vitamin B1, 27.5 times more Vitamin B2, 9.7 times more Vitamin B3, 3.9 times more Vitamin B5, 4.3 times more Vitamin B6, 8.8 times more Vitamin B9 and 37.3 times more Vitamin E than Baked Potato Flesh.
- While 100 g of Baked Potatoes Flesh no Salt contain more Vitamin C than Crude Wheat Bran.
- 100 grams of Wheat Bran have insufficient amounts of Vitamin C
- 100 grams of Baked Potato Flesh have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B2 and Vitamin E
- Both Crude Wheat Bran as well as Baked Potatoes Flesh no Salt have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin B12, Vitamin D and Vitamin K in 100 grams.
Comparing minerals per 100 grams for Wheat Bran vs Baked Potato Flesh:
- 100 grams of Wheat Bran have 14.6 times more Calcium, 4.6 times more Copper, 30.2 times more Iron, 24.4 times more Magnesium, 71.4 times more Manganese, 20.3 times more Phosphorus, 3 times more Potassium, 258.7 times more Selenium and 25.1 times more Zinc than Baked Potato Flesh.
- While 100 g of Baked Potatoes Flesh no Salt contain 7.6 times more Water than Crude Wheat Bran.
- 100 grams of Baked Potato Flesh lack sufficient amounts of Calcium and Selenium
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 100 grams:
- 100 grams of Wheat Bran have 2.3 times more Energy, 42.5 times more Fat, 16.7 times more Omega 3, 63.7 times more Omega 6, 3 times more Carbohydrate, 28.5 times more Fiber and 7.9 times more Protein than Baked Potato Flesh.
- While 100 g of Baked Potatoes Flesh no Salt contain 4.1 times more Sugars than Crude Wheat Bran.
- 100 grams of Baked Potato Flesh provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3 and Omega 6