Comparing Nutrients in 300 calories Canned ButterburVS Acorns
Weight per 300 calories
Canned Butterbur
10000g
Acorns
77.5g
Raw Acorns have 129 times more energy per unit of mass than Canned Butterbur, which is high in comparison to other foods. Canned Butterbur having very low energy density.
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Canned Butterbur or Acorns?
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Canned Butterbur or Acorns?
Lets compare vitamin content per 300 calories of Canned Butterbur vs Acorns:
300 calories of Canned Butterbur have 6.9 times more Vitamin B1, 6.6 times more Vitamin B2, 9.9 times more Vitamin B3, 2 times more Vitamin B5, 8.1 times more Vitamin B6, 4.4 times more Vitamin B9 and more Vitamin C than Acorns.
300 calories of Acorns have insufficient amounts of Vitamin C
Both Canned Butterbur as well as Raw Acorns have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A and Vitamin B12 in 300 calories.
Comparing minerals per 300 calories for Canned Butterbur vs Acorns:
300 calories of Canned Butterbur have 107 times more Calcium, 7.7 times more Copper, 102.9 times more Iron, 4.2 times more Magnesium, 9.5 times more Manganese, 6.5 times more Phosphorus, 2.9 times more Potassium, more Sodium, 15.2 times more Zinc and 452.7 times more Water than Acorns.
300 calories of Acorns lack sufficient amounts of Calcium and Zinc
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 300 calories:
300 calories of Canned Butterbur have 1.2 times more Carbohydrate and 2.3 times more Protein than Acorns.
While 300 kcal of Raw Acorns contain 1.4 times more Fat than Canned Butterbur.
Both Canned Butterbur and Acorns offer comparable quantities of Energy per 300 calories.