Comparing Nutrients in 300 calories CassavaVS Chinese Crunchy Flat Noodles
Weight per 300 calories
Cassava
188g
Chinese Crunchy Flat Noodles
57.6g
Chinese Restaurant Crunchy Flat Noodles have 3.3 times more energy per unit of mass than Raw Cassava, which is very high in comparison to other foods. Cassava having above average energy density.
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Cassava or Chinese Crunchy Flat Noodles?
Cassava VS Chinese Crunchy Flat Noodles Nutrients Per 300 Kcal
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Cassava or Chinese Crunchy Flat Noodles?
Lets compare vitamin content per 300 calories of Cassava vs Chinese Crunchy Flat Noodles:
300 calories of Cassava have 1.5 times more Vitamin B1, 1.4 times more Vitamin B2, 10.6 times more Vitamin B6, 5.2 times more Vitamin B9 and more Vitamin C than Chinese Crunchy Flat Noodles.
While 300 kcal of Chinese Restaurant Crunchy Flat Noodles contain 5.3 times more Vitamin E than Raw Cassava.
Both Cassava and Chinese Crunchy Flat Noodles provide similar amounts of Vitamin B3 per 300 calories.
300 calories of Cassava have insufficient amounts of Vitamin E
300 calories of Chinese Crunchy Flat Noodles have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B2, Vitamin B6, Vitamin B9 and Vitamin C
Both Raw Cassava as well as Chinese Restaurant Crunchy Flat Noodles have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin B5, Vitamin B12, Vitamin D and Vitamin K in 300 calories.
Comparing minerals per 300 calories for Cassava vs Chinese Crunchy Flat Noodles:
300 calories of Cassava have 2.7 times more Copper, 3.3 times more Magnesium, 3.4 times more Manganese and 9.9 times more Potassium than Chinese Crunchy Flat Noodles.
While 300 kcal of Chinese Restaurant Crunchy Flat Noodles contain 2 times more Iron, 14.1 times more Selenium and 8.3 times more Sodium than Raw Cassava.
Both Cassava and Chinese Crunchy Flat Noodles contain similar levels of Phosphorus per 300 calories.
300 calories of Cassava lack sufficient amounts of Selenium
300 calories of Chinese Crunchy Flat Noodles lack sufficient amounts of Magnesium and Potassium
Both Raw Cassava as well as Chinese Restaurant Crunchy Flat Noodles lack sufficient amounts of Calcium and Zinc in 300 calories.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 300 calories:
300 calories of Cassava have 2.4 times more Carbohydrate and 3.1 times more Fiber than Chinese Crunchy Flat Noodles.
While 300 kcal of Chinese Restaurant Crunchy Flat Noodles contain 34.8 times more Fat, 20.5 times more Saturated Fat, 36.5 times more Omega 3, 143.1 times more Omega 6 and 2.3 times more Protein than Raw Cassava.
Both Cassava and Chinese Crunchy Flat Noodles offer comparable quantities of Energy per 300 calories.
300 calories of Cassava provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3, Omega 6 and Protein
300 calories of Chinese Crunchy Flat Noodles provide inadequate amounts of Fiber