Comparing Nutrients in 300 calories CassavaVS Reduced Fat Commercial Italian Salad Dressing
Weight per 300 calories
Cassava
188g
Reduced Fat Commercial Italian Salad Dressing
294g
Cassava has 1.6 times more energy per 100g than Reduced Fat Commercial Italian Salad Dressing. It has above average energy density when compared to other foods. Reduced Fat Commercial Italian Salad Dressing having average energy density.
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Cassava or Reduced Fat Commercial Italian Salad Dressing?
Cassava VS Reduced Fat Commercial Italian Salad Dressing Nutrients Per 300 Kcal
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Cassava or Reduced Fat Commercial Italian Salad Dressing?
Lets compare vitamin content per 300 calories of Cassava vs Reduced Fat Commercial Italian Salad Dressing:
300 calories of Cassava have 4.6 times more Vitamin B1, 3.8 times more Vitamin B2, 5.8 times more Vitamin B3, 5.7 times more Vitamin B9 and more Vitamin C than Reduced Fat Commercial Italian Salad Dressing.
While 300 kcal of Reduced Fat Commercial Italian Salad Dressing contain 35.3 times more Vitamin E and 10.3 times more Vitamin K than Raw Cassava.
Both Cassava and Reduced Fat Commercial Italian Salad Dressing provide similar amounts of Vitamin B6 per 300 calories.
300 calories of Cassava have insufficient amounts of Vitamin E and Vitamin K
300 calories of Reduced Fat Commercial Italian Salad Dressing have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B1, Vitamin B2, Vitamin B3, Vitamin B9 and Vitamin C
Both Raw Cassava as well as Reduced Fat Commercial Italian Salad Dressing have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin B5, Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D in 300 calories.
Comparing minerals per 300 calories for Cassava vs Reduced Fat Commercial Italian Salad Dressing:
300 calories of Cassava have 3.4 times more Copper, 3.3 times more Magnesium, 8.4 times more Manganese, 1.4 times more Phosphorus and 1.9 times more Potassium than Reduced Fat Commercial Italian Salad Dressing.
While 300 kcal of Reduced Fat Commercial Italian Salad Dressing contain 1.5 times more Iron, 3.6 times more Selenium, 99.8 times more Sodium and 2.1 times more Water than Raw Cassava.
300 calories of Cassava lack sufficient amounts of Selenium
300 calories of Reduced Fat Commercial Italian Salad Dressing lack sufficient amounts of Magnesium, Manganese and Phosphorus
Both Raw Cassava as well as Reduced Fat Commercial Italian Salad Dressing lack sufficient amounts of Calcium and Zinc in 300 calories.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 300 calories:
300 calories of Cassava have 2.4 times more Carbohydrate and more Fiber than Reduced Fat Commercial Italian Salad Dressing.
While 300 kcal of Reduced Fat Commercial Italian Salad Dressing contain 37.4 times more Fat, 17.7 times more Saturated Fat, 42.3 times more Omega 3, 136 times more Omega 6 and 8.5 times more Sugars than Raw Cassava.
Both Cassava and Reduced Fat Commercial Italian Salad Dressing offer comparable quantities of Energy per 300 calories.
300 calories of Cassava provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3 and Omega 6
300 calories of Reduced Fat Commercial Italian Salad Dressing provide inadequate amounts of Fiber
Both Raw Cassava as well as Reduced Fat Commercial Italian Salad Dressing provide inadequate amounts of Protein in 300 calories.