Nutrient Comparison: Cassava VS Reduced Fat Commercial Italian Salad Dressing per 100 g
Compare the macro and micronutrient content in 100 g of Cassava versus 100 g of Reduced Fat Commercial Italian Salad Dressing to make informed dietary choices. Explore their nutritional differences and benefits.
Lets compare vitamin content per 100 grams of Cassava vs Reduced Fat Commercial Italian Salad Dressing:
- 100 grams of Cassava have 7.3 times more Vitamin B1, 6 times more Vitamin B2, 9.1 times more Vitamin B3, more Vitamin B5, 1.6 times more Vitamin B6, 9 times more Vitamin B9 and more Vitamin C than Reduced Fat Commercial Italian Salad Dressing.
- While 100 g of Reduced Fat Commercial Italian Salad Dressing contain 22.5 times more Vitamin E and 6.6 times more Vitamin K than Raw Cassava.
- 100 grams of Cassava have insufficient amounts of Vitamin E and Vitamin K
- 100 grams of Reduced Fat Commercial Italian Salad Dressing have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B1, Vitamin B2, Vitamin B3, Vitamin B5, Vitamin B9 and Vitamin C
- Both Raw Cassava as well as Reduced Fat Commercial Italian Salad Dressing have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D in 100 grams.
Comparing minerals per 100 grams for Cassava vs Reduced Fat Commercial Italian Salad Dressing:
- 100 grams of Cassava have 5.3 times more Copper, 5.3 times more Magnesium, 13.2 times more Manganese, 2.3 times more Phosphorus, 3 times more Potassium and 5.7 times more Zinc than Reduced Fat Commercial Italian Salad Dressing.
- While 100 g of Reduced Fat Commercial Italian Salad Dressing contain 2.3 times more Selenium, 63.6 times more Sodium and 1.3 times more Water than Raw Cassava.
- Both Cassava and Reduced Fat Commercial Italian Salad Dressing contain similar levels of Iron per 100 grams.
- 100 grams of Cassava lack sufficient amounts of Selenium
- 100 grams of Reduced Fat Commercial Italian Salad Dressing lack sufficient amounts of Magnesium, Manganese, Phosphorus and Zinc
- Both Raw Cassava as well as Reduced Fat Commercial Italian Salad Dressing lack sufficient amounts of Calcium in 100 grams.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 100 grams:
- 100 grams of Cassava have 1.6 times more Energy, 3.8 times more Carbohydrate, more Fiber and 3.5 times more Protein than Reduced Fat Commercial Italian Salad Dressing.
- While 100 g of Reduced Fat Commercial Italian Salad Dressing contain 23.9 times more Fat, 11.3 times more Saturated Fat, 26.9 times more Omega 3, 86.7 times more Omega 6 and 5.4 times more Sugars than Raw Cassava.
- 100 grams of Cassava provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3 and Omega 6
- 100 grams of Reduced Fat Commercial Italian Salad Dressing provide inadequate amounts of Fiber and Protein