Comparing Nutrients in 300 calories Meatless Luncheon SlicesVS Sweet and Sour Salad Dressing
Weight per 300 calories
Meatless Luncheon Slices
159g
Sweet and Sour Salad Dressing
2000g
Meatless Luncheon Slices have 12.6 times more energy per 100g than Sweet and Sour Salad Dressing. It has above average energy density when compared to other foods. Sweet and Sour Salad Dressing having very low energy density.
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Meatless Luncheon Slices or Sweet and Sour Salad Dressing?
Meatless Luncheon Slices VS Sweet And Sour Salad Dressing Nutrients Per 300 Kcal
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Meatless Luncheon Slices or Sweet and Sour Salad Dressing?
Lets compare vitamin content per 300 calories of Meatless Luncheon Slices vs Sweet and Sour Salad Dressing:
300 calories of Meatless Luncheon Slices have 31.7 times more Vitamin B1, more Vitamin B2, 14.7 times more Vitamin B3, 7.1 times more Vitamin B6, 4 times more Vitamin B9 and more Vitamin B12 than Sweet and Sour Salad Dressing.
While 300 kcal of Sweet and Sour Salad Dressing contain more Vitamin C, 10.8 times more Vitamin E and more Vitamin K than Meatless Luncheon Slices.
300 calories of Meatless Luncheon Slices have insufficient amounts of Vitamin C and Vitamin K
300 calories of Sweet and Sour Salad Dressing have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B2 and Vitamin B12
Both Meatless Luncheon Slices as well as Sweet and Sour Salad Dressing have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A and Vitamin D in 300 calories.
Comparing minerals per 300 calories for Meatless Luncheon Slices vs Sweet and Sour Salad Dressing:
300 calories of Meatless Luncheon Slices have 7.2 times more Copper, 3.6 times more Iron, 11.7 times more Phosphorus and 6.3 times more Zinc than Sweet and Sour Salad Dressing.
While 300 kcal of Sweet and Sour Salad Dressing contain 1.6 times more Magnesium, 2.1 times more Potassium, 2.7 times more Selenium, 3.7 times more Sodium and 18.5 times more Water than Meatless Luncheon Slices.
Both Meatless Luncheon Slices and Sweet and Sour Salad Dressing contain similar levels of Calcium per 300 calories.
300 calories of Sweet and Sour Salad Dressing lack sufficient amounts of Zinc
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 300 calories:
300 calories of Meatless Luncheon Slices have more Fat, more Saturated Fat, more Omega 3, more Omega 6 and 14.1 times more Protein than Sweet and Sour Salad Dressing.
While 300 kcal of Sweet and Sour Salad Dressing contain 10.5 times more Carbohydrate and 21 times more Sugars than Meatless Luncheon Slices.
Both Meatless Luncheon Slices and Sweet and Sour Salad Dressing offer comparable quantities of Energy per 300 calories.
300 calories of Meatless Luncheon Slices provide inadequate amounts of Carbohydrate
300 calories of Sweet and Sour Salad Dressing provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3, Omega 6 and Protein
Both Meatless Luncheon Slices as well as Sweet and Sour Salad Dressing provide inadequate amounts of Fiber in 300 calories.