Comparing Nutrients in 300 calories Chinese Crunchy Flat NoodlesVS Cassava
Weight per 300 calories
Chinese Crunchy Flat Noodles
57.6g
Cassava
188g
Chinese Crunchy Flat Noodles have 3.3 times more energy per 100g than Cassava. It has very high energy density when compared to other foods. Raw Cassava having above average energy density.
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Chinese Crunchy Flat Noodles or Cassava?
Chinese Crunchy Flat Noodles VS Cassava Nutrients Per 300 Kcal
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Chinese Crunchy Flat Noodles or Cassava?
Lets compare vitamin content per 300 calories of Chinese Crunchy Flat Noodles vs Cassava:
300 calories of Chinese Crunchy Flat Noodles have 5.3 times more Vitamin E than Cassava.
While 300 kcal of Raw Cassava contain 1.5 times more Vitamin B1, 1.4 times more Vitamin B2, 10.6 times more Vitamin B6, 5.2 times more Vitamin B9 and more Vitamin C than Chinese Restaurant Crunchy Flat Noodles.
Both Chinese Crunchy Flat Noodles and Cassava provide similar amounts of Vitamin B3 per 300 calories.
300 calories of Chinese Crunchy Flat Noodles have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B2, Vitamin B6, Vitamin B9 and Vitamin C
300 calories of Cassava have insufficient amounts of Vitamin E
Both Chinese Restaurant Crunchy Flat Noodles as well as Raw Cassava have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin B5, Vitamin B12, Vitamin D and Vitamin K in 300 calories.
Comparing minerals per 300 calories for Chinese Crunchy Flat Noodles vs Cassava:
300 calories of Chinese Crunchy Flat Noodles have 2 times more Iron, 14.1 times more Selenium and 8.3 times more Sodium than Cassava.
While 300 kcal of Raw Cassava contain 2.7 times more Copper, 3.3 times more Magnesium, 3.4 times more Manganese and 9.9 times more Potassium than Chinese Restaurant Crunchy Flat Noodles.
Both Chinese Crunchy Flat Noodles and Cassava contain similar levels of Phosphorus per 300 calories.
300 calories of Chinese Crunchy Flat Noodles lack sufficient amounts of Magnesium and Potassium
300 calories of Cassava lack sufficient amounts of Selenium
Both Chinese Restaurant Crunchy Flat Noodles as well as Raw Cassava lack sufficient amounts of Calcium and Zinc in 300 calories.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 300 calories:
300 calories of Chinese Crunchy Flat Noodles have 34.8 times more Fat, 20.5 times more Saturated Fat, 36.5 times more Omega 3, 143.1 times more Omega 6 and 2.3 times more Protein than Cassava.
While 300 kcal of Raw Cassava contain 2.4 times more Carbohydrate and 3.1 times more Fiber than Chinese Restaurant Crunchy Flat Noodles.
Both Chinese Crunchy Flat Noodles and Cassava offer comparable quantities of Energy per 300 calories.
300 calories of Chinese Crunchy Flat Noodles provide inadequate amounts of Fiber
300 calories of Cassava provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3, Omega 6 and Protein