Comparing Nutrients in 300 calories Blanched AlmondsVS Cooked Sweet Potato, Baked In Skin, Flesh with Salt
Weight per 300 calories
Blanched Almonds
50.8g
Cooked Sweet Potato, Baked In Skin, Flesh with Salt
333g
Blanched Almonds have 6.6 times more energy per 100g than Cooked Sweet Potato, Baked In Skin, Flesh with Salt. It has very high energy density when compared to other foods. Cooked Sweet Potato, Baked In Skin, Flesh with Salt having average energy density.
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Blanched Almonds or Cooked Sweet Potato, Baked In Skin, Flesh with Salt?
Macros Ratio
ProteinFatCarbs
Blanched Almonds
14%
75%
11%
Cooked Sweet Potato, Baked In Skin, Flesh with Salt
Blanched Almonds VS Cooked Sweet Potato, Baked In Skin, Flesh With Salt Nutrients Per 300 Kcal
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Blanched Almonds or Cooked Sweet Potato, Baked In Skin, Flesh with Salt?
Lets compare vitamin content per 300 calories of Blanched Almonds vs Cooked Sweet Potato, Baked In Skin, Flesh with Salt:
300 calories of Blanched Almonds have 1.2 times more Vitamin B9 and 5.1 times more Vitamin E than Cooked Sweet Potato, Baked In Skin, Flesh with Salt.
While 300 kcal of Cooked Sweet Potato, Baked In Skin, Flesh with Salt contain more Vitamin A, 3.7 times more Vitamin B1, 2.8 times more Vitamin B3, 18.5 times more Vitamin B5, 16.3 times more Vitamin B6, more Vitamin C and more Vitamin K than Blanched Almonds.
Both Blanched Almonds and Cooked Sweet Potato, Baked In Skin, Flesh with Salt provide similar amounts of Vitamin B2 per 300 calories.
300 calories of Blanched Almonds have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin B5, Vitamin B6, Vitamin C and Vitamin K
300 calories of Cooked Sweet Potato, Baked In Skin, Flesh with Salt have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B9
Both Blanched Almonds as well as Cooked Sweet Potato, Baked In Skin, Flesh with Salt have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D in 300 calories.
Comparing minerals per 300 calories for Blanched Almonds vs Cooked Sweet Potato, Baked In Skin, Flesh with Salt:
300 calories of Blanched Almonds have 1.5 times more Magnesium, 1.4 times more Phosphorus and 1.4 times more Zinc than Cooked Sweet Potato, Baked In Skin, Flesh with Salt.
While 300 kcal of Cooked Sweet Potato, Baked In Skin, Flesh with Salt contain 1.4 times more Iron, 1.8 times more Manganese, 4.7 times more Potassium, 84.9 times more Sodium and 110.2 times more Water than Blanched Almonds.
Both Blanched Almonds and Cooked Sweet Potato, Baked In Skin, Flesh with Salt contain similar levels of Calcium and Copper per 300 calories.
Both Blanched Almonds as well as Cooked Sweet Potato, Baked In Skin, Flesh with Salt lack sufficient amounts of Selenium in 300 calories.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 300 calories:
300 calories of Blanched Almonds have 53.4 times more Fat, 11.6 times more Saturated Fat, 21 times more Omega 6 and 1.6 times more Protein than Cooked Sweet Potato, Baked In Skin, Flesh with Salt.
While 300 kcal of Cooked Sweet Potato, Baked In Skin, Flesh with Salt contain 7.3 times more Carbohydrate, 9.2 times more Sugars and 2.2 times more Fiber than Blanched Almonds.
Both Blanched Almonds and Cooked Sweet Potato, Baked In Skin, Flesh with Salt offer comparable quantities of Energy per 300 calories.
300 calories of Cooked Sweet Potato, Baked In Skin, Flesh with Salt provide inadequate amounts of Omega 6
Both Blanched Almonds as well as Cooked Sweet Potato, Baked In Skin, Flesh with Salt provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3 in 300 calories.