Comparing Nutrients in 300 calories Navel OrangesVS Boiled Hubbard Winter Squash with Salt
Weight per 300 calories
Navel Oranges
612g
Boiled Hubbard Winter Squash with Salt
1000g
Navel Oranges have 1.6 times more energy per 100g than Boiled Hubbard Winter Squash with Salt. It has low energy density when compared to other foods. Boiled and Drained Hubbard Winter Squash with Salt having low energy density.
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Navel Oranges or Boiled Hubbard Winter Squash with Salt?
Navel Oranges VS Boiled Hubbard Winter Squash With Salt Nutrients Per 300 Kcal
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Navel Oranges or Boiled Hubbard Winter Squash with Salt?
Lets compare vitamin content per 300 calories of Navel Oranges vs Boiled Hubbard Winter Squash with Salt:
300 calories of Navel Oranges have 2.1 times more Vitamin B9 and 5.6 times more Vitamin C than Boiled Hubbard Winter Squash with Salt.
While 300 kcal of Boiled and Drained Hubbard Winter Squash with Salt contain 27.2 times more Vitamin A, 1.3 times more Vitamin B3, 1.9 times more Vitamin B5, 2.1 times more Vitamin B6, 1.3 times more Vitamin E and more Vitamin K than Raw Navel Oranges.
Both Navel Oranges and Boiled Hubbard Winter Squash with Salt provide similar amounts of Vitamin B1 and Vitamin B2 per 300 calories.
300 calories of Navel Oranges have insufficient amounts of Vitamin K
Both Raw Navel Oranges as well as Boiled and Drained Hubbard Winter Squash with Salt have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D in 300 calories.
Comparing minerals per 300 calories for Navel Oranges vs Boiled Hubbard Winter Squash with Salt:
300 calories of Navel Oranges have 2.6 times more Calcium than Boiled Hubbard Winter Squash with Salt.
While 300 kcal of Boiled and Drained Hubbard Winter Squash with Salt contain 2 times more Copper, 3.5 times more Iron, 1.9 times more Magnesium, 7.1 times more Manganese, 2.1 times more Potassium, 393.6 times more Sodium, 2 times more Zinc and 1.7 times more Water than Raw Navel Oranges.
Both Navel Oranges and Boiled Hubbard Winter Squash with Salt contain similar levels of Phosphorus per 300 calories.
300 calories of Navel Oranges lack sufficient amounts of Zinc
Both Raw Navel Oranges as well as Boiled and Drained Hubbard Winter Squash with Salt lack sufficient amounts of Selenium in 300 calories.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 300 calories:
300 calories of Navel Oranges have 1.8 times more Sugars than Boiled Hubbard Winter Squash with Salt.
While 300 kcal of Boiled and Drained Hubbard Winter Squash with Salt contain 17.6 times more Omega 3, 2.2 times more Fiber and 2.7 times more Protein than Raw Navel Oranges.
Both Navel Oranges and Boiled Hubbard Winter Squash with Salt offer comparable quantities of Energy and Carbohydrate per 300 calories.
300 calories of Navel Oranges provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3
Both Raw Navel Oranges as well as Boiled and Drained Hubbard Winter Squash with Salt provide inadequate amounts of Omega 6 in 300 calories.