Comparing Nutrients in 300 calories Potato chips, without salt, reduced fatVS Oranges with Peel
Weight per 300 calories
Potato chips, without salt, reduced fat
61.6g
Oranges with Peel
476g
Potato chips, without salt, reduced fat have 7.7 times more energy per 100g than Oranges with Peel . It has very high energy density when compared to other foods. Raw Oranges with Peel having low energy density.
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Potato chips, without salt, reduced fat or Oranges with Peel ?
Potato Chips, Without Salt, Reduced Fat VS Oranges With Peel Nutrients Per 300 Kcal
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Potato chips, without salt, reduced fat or Oranges with Peel ?
Lets compare vitamin content per 300 calories of Potato chips, without salt, reduced fat vs Oranges with Peel :
300 calories of Potato chips, without salt, reduced fat have 1.8 times more Vitamin B3 than Oranges with Peel .
While 300 kcal of Raw Oranges with Peel contain more Vitamin A, 3.7 times more Vitamin B1, 1.4 times more Vitamin B2, 23.2 times more Vitamin B9 and 21.4 times more Vitamin C than Potato chips, without salt, reduced fat.
Both Potato chips, without salt, reduced fat and Oranges with Peel provide similar amounts of Vitamin B6 per 300 calories.
300 calories of Potato chips, without salt, reduced fat have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A and Vitamin B9
Both Potato chips, without salt, reduced fat as well as Raw Oranges with Peel have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B12 in 300 calories.
Comparing minerals per 300 calories for Potato chips, without salt, reduced fat vs Oranges with Peel :
300 calories of Potato chips, without salt, reduced fat have 1.5 times more Selenium than Oranges with Peel .
While 300 kcal of Raw Oranges with Peel contain 25.8 times more Calcium, 1.3 times more Copper, 4.6 times more Iron and 636.2 times more Water than Potato chips, without salt, reduced fat.
Both Potato chips, without salt, reduced fat and Oranges with Peel contain similar levels of Magnesium, Phosphorus and Potassium per 300 calories.
300 calories of Potato chips, without salt, reduced fat lack sufficient amounts of Calcium
Both Potato chips, without salt, reduced fat as well as Raw Oranges with Peel lack sufficient amounts of Zinc in 300 calories.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 300 calories:
300 calories of Potato chips, without salt, reduced fat have 9 times more Fat, 15.4 times more Saturated Fat, 1.5 times more Omega 3 and 31.6 times more Omega 6 than Oranges with Peel .
While 300 kcal of Raw Oranges with Peel contain 1.8 times more Carbohydrate, 5.7 times more Fiber and 1.4 times more Protein than Potato chips, without salt, reduced fat.
Both Potato chips, without salt, reduced fat and Oranges with Peel offer comparable quantities of Energy per 300 calories.
300 calories of Oranges with Peel provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3 and Omega 6