Comparing Nutrients in 300 calories Baked Potato FleshVS Rolls, gluten-free, whole grain, made with tapioca starch and brown rice flour
Weight per 300 calories
Baked Potato Flesh
323g
Rolls, gluten-free, whole grain, made with tapioca starch and brown rice flour
91g
Rolls, gluten-free, whole grain, made with tapioca starch and brown rice flour have 3.5 times more energy per unit of mass than Baked Potatoes Flesh no Salt, which is high in comparison to other foods. Baked Potato Flesh having average energy density.
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Baked Potato Flesh or Rolls, gluten-free, whole grain, made with tapioca starch and brown rice flour?
Macros Ratio
ProteinFatCarbs
Baked Potato Flesh
8%
1%
91%
Rolls, gluten-free, whole grain, made with tapioca starch and brown rice flour
Baked Potato Flesh VS Rolls, Gluten-free, Whole Grain, Made With Tapioca Starch And Brown Rice Flour Nutrients Per 300 Kcal
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Baked Potato Flesh or Rolls, gluten-free, whole grain, made with tapioca starch and brown rice flour?
Lets compare vitamin content per 300 calories of Baked Potato Flesh vs Rolls, gluten-free, whole grain, made with tapioca starch and brown rice flour:
300 calories of Baked Potato Flesh have 1.3 times more Vitamin B3 than Rolls, gluten-free, whole grain, made with tapioca starch and brown rice flour.
While 300 kcal of Rolls, gluten-free, whole grain, made with tapioca starch and brown rice flour contain 4.8 times more Vitamin B2 and 9.8 times more Vitamin E than Baked Potatoes Flesh no Salt.
Both Baked Potato Flesh and Rolls, gluten-free, whole grain, made with tapioca starch and brown rice flour provide similar amounts of Vitamin B1 per 300 calories.
300 calories of Baked Potato Flesh have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B2 and Vitamin E
Comparing minerals per 300 calories for Baked Potato Flesh vs Rolls, gluten-free, whole grain, made with tapioca starch and brown rice flour:
300 calories of Baked Potato Flesh have 2.9 times more Copper, 5.1 times more Potassium and 8.9 times more Water than Rolls, gluten-free, whole grain, made with tapioca starch and brown rice flour.
While 300 kcal of Rolls, gluten-free, whole grain, made with tapioca starch and brown rice flour contain 6.7 times more Calcium, 1.3 times more Iron, 3 times more Manganese, 1.3 times more Phosphorus, 23.6 times more Selenium, 28.7 times more Sodium and 1.3 times more Zinc than Baked Potatoes Flesh no Salt.
Both Baked Potato Flesh and Rolls, gluten-free, whole grain, made with tapioca starch and brown rice flour contain similar levels of Magnesium per 300 calories.
300 calories of Baked Potato Flesh lack sufficient amounts of Calcium and Selenium
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 300 calories:
300 calories of Baked Potato Flesh have 1.7 times more Carbohydrate and 1.4 times more Sugars than Rolls, gluten-free, whole grain, made with tapioca starch and brown rice flour.
While 300 kcal of Rolls, gluten-free, whole grain, made with tapioca starch and brown rice flour contain 32.8 times more Fat, 50.1 times more Omega 3, 27.8 times more Omega 6, 2.1 times more Fiber and 1.7 times more Protein than Baked Potatoes Flesh no Salt.
Both Baked Potato Flesh and Rolls, gluten-free, whole grain, made with tapioca starch and brown rice flour offer comparable quantities of Energy per 300 calories.
300 calories of Baked Potato Flesh provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3 and Omega 6