Composite Household Vegetable Shortening has 15.2 times more energy per unit of mass than Raw Potato Skin, which is very high in comparison to other foods. Potato Skin having low energy density.
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Potato Skin or Composite Household Vegetable Shortening?
Potato Skin VS Composite Household Vegetable Shortening Nutrients Per 300 Kcal
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Potato Skin or Composite Household Vegetable Shortening?
Lets compare vitamin content per 300 calories of Potato Skin vs Composite Household Vegetable Shortening:
300 calories of Potato Skin have 16 times more Vitamin B1, more Vitamin B2, more Vitamin B3, 6.8 times more Vitamin B5, 3642.7 times more Vitamin B6, more Vitamin B9 and more Vitamin C than Composite Household Vegetable Shortening.
300 calories of Composite Household Vegetable Shortening have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B1, Vitamin B2, Vitamin B3, Vitamin B5, Vitamin B6, Vitamin B9 and Vitamin C
Both Raw Potato Skin as well as Composite Household Vegetable Shortening have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D in 300 calories.
Comparing minerals per 300 calories for Potato Skin vs Composite Household Vegetable Shortening:
300 calories of Potato Skin have 457.2 times more Calcium, more Copper, 705.5 times more Iron, more Magnesium, more Manganese, more Phosphorus, more Potassium, more Zinc and more Water than Composite Household Vegetable Shortening.
300 calories of Composite Household Vegetable Shortening lack sufficient amounts of Calcium, Copper, Iron, Magnesium, Manganese, Phosphorus, Potassium and Zinc
Both Raw Potato Skin as well as Composite Household Vegetable Shortening lack sufficient amounts of Selenium in 300 calories.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 300 calories:
300 calories of Potato Skin have more Carbohydrate, more Fiber and more Protein than Composite Household Vegetable Shortening.
While 300 kcal of Composite Household Vegetable Shortening contain 65.6 times more Fat, 63 times more Saturated Fat, 12.4 times more Omega 3 and 53.7 times more Omega 6 than Raw Potato Skin.
Both Potato Skin and Composite Household Vegetable Shortening offer comparable quantities of Energy per 300 calories.
300 calories of Potato Skin provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3 and Omega 6
300 calories of Composite Household Vegetable Shortening provide inadequate amounts of Carbohydrate, Fiber and Protein