Comparing Nutrients in 300 calories Canned PumpkinVS Acorns
Weight per 300 calories
Canned Pumpkin
882g
Acorns
77.5g
Raw Acorns have 11.4 times more energy per unit of mass than Canned Pumpkin no Salt, which is high in comparison to other foods. Canned Pumpkin having low energy density.
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Canned Pumpkin or Acorns?
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Canned Pumpkin or Acorns?
Lets compare vitamin content per 300 calories of Canned Pumpkin vs Acorns:
300 calories of Canned Pumpkin have 4427.7 times more Vitamin A, 2.4 times more Vitamin B1, 5.2 times more Vitamin B2, 2.3 times more Vitamin B3, 6.4 times more Vitamin B5, 1.2 times more Vitamin B6, 1.6 times more Vitamin B9 and more Vitamin C than Acorns.
300 calories of Acorns have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A and Vitamin C
Both Canned Pumpkin no Salt as well as Raw Acorns have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B12 in 300 calories.
Comparing minerals per 300 calories for Canned Pumpkin vs Acorns:
300 calories of Canned Pumpkin have 7.2 times more Calcium, 2 times more Copper, 20 times more Iron, 4.2 times more Magnesium, 1.3 times more Manganese, 5 times more Phosphorus, 4.4 times more Potassium, 3.8 times more Zinc and 36.7 times more Water than Acorns.
300 calories of Acorns lack sufficient amounts of Calcium and Zinc
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 300 calories:
300 calories of Canned Pumpkin have 2.3 times more Carbohydrate and 2 times more Protein than Acorns.
While 300 kcal of Raw Acorns contain 7.5 times more Fat, 1.9 times more Saturated Fat and 57.7 times more Omega 6 than Canned Pumpkin no Salt.
Both Canned Pumpkin and Acorns offer comparable quantities of Energy per 300 calories.
300 calories of Canned Pumpkin provide inadequate amounts of Omega 6