Comparing Nutrients in 300 calories Reduced Fat Commercial Italian Salad DressingVS Cassava
Weight per 300 calories
Reduced Fat Commercial Italian Salad Dressing
294g
Cassava
188g
Raw Cassava has 1.6 times more energy per unit of mass than Reduced Fat Commercial Italian Salad Dressing, which is above average in comparison to other foods. Reduced Fat Commercial Italian Salad Dressing having average energy density.
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Reduced Fat Commercial Italian Salad Dressing or Cassava?
Reduced Fat Commercial Italian Salad Dressing VS Cassava Nutrients Per 300 Kcal
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Reduced Fat Commercial Italian Salad Dressing or Cassava?
Lets compare vitamin content per 300 calories of Reduced Fat Commercial Italian Salad Dressing vs Cassava:
300 calories of Reduced Fat Commercial Italian Salad Dressing have 35.3 times more Vitamin E and 10.3 times more Vitamin K than Cassava.
While 300 kcal of Raw Cassava contain 4.6 times more Vitamin B1, 3.8 times more Vitamin B2, 5.8 times more Vitamin B3, 5.7 times more Vitamin B9 and more Vitamin C than Reduced Fat Commercial Italian Salad Dressing.
Both Reduced Fat Commercial Italian Salad Dressing and Cassava provide similar amounts of Vitamin B6 per 300 calories.
300 calories of Reduced Fat Commercial Italian Salad Dressing have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B1, Vitamin B2, Vitamin B3, Vitamin B9 and Vitamin C
300 calories of Cassava have insufficient amounts of Vitamin E and Vitamin K
Both Reduced Fat Commercial Italian Salad Dressing as well as Raw Cassava have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin B5, Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D in 300 calories.
Comparing minerals per 300 calories for Reduced Fat Commercial Italian Salad Dressing vs Cassava:
300 calories of Reduced Fat Commercial Italian Salad Dressing have 1.5 times more Iron, 3.6 times more Selenium, 99.8 times more Sodium and 2.1 times more Water than Cassava.
While 300 kcal of Raw Cassava contain 3.4 times more Copper, 3.3 times more Magnesium, 8.4 times more Manganese, 1.4 times more Phosphorus and 1.9 times more Potassium than Reduced Fat Commercial Italian Salad Dressing.
300 calories of Reduced Fat Commercial Italian Salad Dressing lack sufficient amounts of Magnesium, Manganese and Phosphorus
300 calories of Cassava lack sufficient amounts of Selenium
Both Reduced Fat Commercial Italian Salad Dressing as well as Raw Cassava lack sufficient amounts of Calcium and Zinc in 300 calories.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 300 calories:
300 calories of Reduced Fat Commercial Italian Salad Dressing have 37.4 times more Fat, 17.7 times more Saturated Fat, 42.3 times more Omega 3, 136 times more Omega 6 and 8.5 times more Sugars than Cassava.
While 300 kcal of Raw Cassava contain 2.4 times more Carbohydrate and more Fiber than Reduced Fat Commercial Italian Salad Dressing.
Both Reduced Fat Commercial Italian Salad Dressing and Cassava offer comparable quantities of Energy per 300 calories.
300 calories of Reduced Fat Commercial Italian Salad Dressing provide inadequate amounts of Fiber
300 calories of Cassava provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3 and Omega 6
Both Reduced Fat Commercial Italian Salad Dressing as well as Raw Cassava provide inadequate amounts of Protein in 300 calories.