Nutrient Comparison: Reduced Fat Commercial Italian Salad Dressing VS Cassava per 100 g
Compare the macro and micronutrient content in 100 g of Reduced Fat Commercial Italian Salad Dressing versus 100 g of Cassava to make informed dietary choices. Explore their nutritional differences and benefits.
Lets compare vitamin content per 100 grams of Reduced Fat Commercial Italian Salad Dressing vs Cassava:
- 100 grams of Reduced Fat Commercial Italian Salad Dressing have 22.5 times more Vitamin E and 6.6 times more Vitamin K than Cassava.
- While 100 g of Raw Cassava contain 7.3 times more Vitamin B1, 6 times more Vitamin B2, 9.1 times more Vitamin B3, more Vitamin B5, 1.6 times more Vitamin B6, 9 times more Vitamin B9 and more Vitamin C than Reduced Fat Commercial Italian Salad Dressing.
- 100 grams of Reduced Fat Commercial Italian Salad Dressing have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B1, Vitamin B2, Vitamin B3, Vitamin B5, Vitamin B9 and Vitamin C
- 100 grams of Cassava have insufficient amounts of Vitamin E and Vitamin K
- Both Reduced Fat Commercial Italian Salad Dressing as well as Raw Cassava have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D in 100 grams.
Comparing minerals per 100 grams for Reduced Fat Commercial Italian Salad Dressing vs Cassava:
- 100 grams of Reduced Fat Commercial Italian Salad Dressing have 2.3 times more Selenium, 63.6 times more Sodium and 1.3 times more Water than Cassava.
- While 100 g of Raw Cassava contain 5.3 times more Copper, 5.3 times more Magnesium, 13.2 times more Manganese, 2.3 times more Phosphorus, 3 times more Potassium and 5.7 times more Zinc than Reduced Fat Commercial Italian Salad Dressing.
- Both Reduced Fat Commercial Italian Salad Dressing and Cassava contain similar levels of Iron per 100 grams.
- 100 grams of Reduced Fat Commercial Italian Salad Dressing lack sufficient amounts of Magnesium, Manganese, Phosphorus and Zinc
- 100 grams of Cassava lack sufficient amounts of Selenium
- Both Reduced Fat Commercial Italian Salad Dressing as well as Raw Cassava lack sufficient amounts of Calcium in 100 grams.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 100 grams:
- 100 grams of Reduced Fat Commercial Italian Salad Dressing have 23.9 times more Fat, 11.3 times more Saturated Fat, 26.9 times more Omega 3, 86.7 times more Omega 6 and 5.4 times more Sugars than Cassava.
- While 100 g of Raw Cassava contain 1.6 times more Energy, 3.8 times more Carbohydrate, more Fiber and 3.5 times more Protein than Reduced Fat Commercial Italian Salad Dressing.
- 100 grams of Reduced Fat Commercial Italian Salad Dressing provide inadequate amounts of Fiber and Protein
- 100 grams of Cassava provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3 and Omega 6