Comparing Nutrients in 300 calories Cooked Frozen Succotash with SaltVS Navel Oranges
Weight per 300 calories
Cooked Frozen Succotash with Salt
323g
Navel Oranges
612g
Cooked Frozen Succotash with Salt has 1.9 times more energy per 100g than Navel Oranges. It has average energy density when compared to other foods. Raw Navel Oranges having low energy density.
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Cooked Frozen Succotash with Salt or Navel Oranges?
Cooked Frozen Succotash With Salt VS Navel Oranges Nutrients Per 300 Kcal
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Cooked Frozen Succotash with Salt or Navel Oranges?
Lets compare vitamin content per 300 calories of Cooked Frozen Succotash with Salt vs Navel Oranges:
300 calories of Cooked Frozen Succotash with Salt have 1.6 times more Vitamin B3 and more Vitamin K than Navel Oranges.
While 300 kcal of Raw Navel Oranges contain 2.3 times more Vitamin A, 1.7 times more Vitamin B1, 1.4 times more Vitamin B2, 2.1 times more Vitamin B5, 1.6 times more Vitamin B6, 2 times more Vitamin B9, 19 times more Vitamin C and 1.6 times more Vitamin E than Boiled Frozen Succotash, drained with Salt.
300 calories of Cooked Frozen Succotash with Salt have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A and Vitamin E
300 calories of Navel Oranges have insufficient amounts of Vitamin K
Both Boiled Frozen Succotash, drained with Salt as well as Raw Navel Oranges have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D in 300 calories.
Comparing minerals per 300 calories for Cooked Frozen Succotash with Salt vs Navel Oranges:
300 calories of Cooked Frozen Succotash with Salt have 3.6 times more Iron, 5.1 times more Manganese, 1.6 times more Phosphorus, 148.1 times more Sodium and 3 times more Zinc than Navel Oranges.
While 300 kcal of Raw Navel Oranges contain 5.4 times more Calcium and 2.2 times more Water than Boiled Frozen Succotash, drained with Salt.
Both Cooked Frozen Succotash with Salt and Navel Oranges contain similar levels of Copper, Magnesium and Potassium per 300 calories.
300 calories of Cooked Frozen Succotash with Salt lack sufficient amounts of Calcium
300 calories of Navel Oranges lack sufficient amounts of Zinc
Both Boiled Frozen Succotash, drained with Salt as well as Raw Navel Oranges lack sufficient amounts of Selenium in 300 calories.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 300 calories:
300 calories of Cooked Frozen Succotash with Salt have 3.9 times more Omega 3, 8.3 times more Omega 6 and 2.5 times more Protein than Navel Oranges.
While 300 kcal of Raw Navel Oranges contain 7.3 times more Sugars than Boiled Frozen Succotash, drained with Salt.
Both Cooked Frozen Succotash with Salt and Navel Oranges offer comparable quantities of Energy, Carbohydrate and Fiber per 300 calories.
300 calories of Navel Oranges provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3 and Omega 6