Comparing Nutrients in 300 calories Cooked Sweet Potato, Baked In Skin, Flesh with SaltVS Navel Oranges
Weight per 300 calories
Cooked Sweet Potato, Baked In Skin, Flesh with Salt
333g
Navel Oranges
612g
Cooked Sweet Potato, Baked In Skin, Flesh with Salt has 1.8 times more energy per 100g than Navel Oranges. It has average energy density when compared to other foods. Raw Navel Oranges having low energy density.
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Cooked Sweet Potato, Baked In Skin, Flesh with Salt or Navel Oranges?
Macros Ratio
ProteinFatCarbs
Cooked Sweet Potato, Baked In Skin, Flesh with Salt
Cooked Sweet Potato, Baked In Skin, Flesh With Salt VS Navel Oranges Nutrients Per 300 Kcal
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Cooked Sweet Potato, Baked In Skin, Flesh with Salt or Navel Oranges?
Lets compare vitamin content per 300 calories of Cooked Sweet Potato, Baked In Skin, Flesh with Salt vs Navel Oranges:
300 calories of Cooked Sweet Potato, Baked In Skin, Flesh with Salt have 43.6 times more Vitamin A, 1.9 times more Vitamin B3, 1.8 times more Vitamin B5, 2 times more Vitamin B6, 2.6 times more Vitamin E and more Vitamin K than Navel Oranges.
While 300 kcal of Raw Navel Oranges contain 10.4 times more Vitamin B9 and 5.5 times more Vitamin C than Cooked Sweet Potato, Baked In Skin, Flesh with Salt.
Both Cooked Sweet Potato, Baked In Skin, Flesh with Salt and Navel Oranges provide similar amounts of Vitamin B1 and Vitamin B2 per 300 calories.
300 calories of Cooked Sweet Potato, Baked In Skin, Flesh with Salt have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B9
300 calories of Navel Oranges have insufficient amounts of Vitamin K
Both Cooked Sweet Potato, Baked In Skin, Flesh with Salt as well as Raw Navel Oranges have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D in 300 calories.
Comparing minerals per 300 calories for Cooked Sweet Potato, Baked In Skin, Flesh with Salt vs Navel Oranges:
300 calories of Cooked Sweet Potato, Baked In Skin, Flesh with Salt have 2.2 times more Copper, 2.9 times more Iron, 1.3 times more Magnesium, 9.3 times more Manganese, 1.3 times more Phosphorus, 1.6 times more Potassium, 133.9 times more Sodium and 2.2 times more Zinc than Navel Oranges.
While 300 kcal of Raw Navel Oranges contain 2.1 times more Calcium and 2.1 times more Water than Cooked Sweet Potato, Baked In Skin, Flesh with Salt.
300 calories of Navel Oranges lack sufficient amounts of Zinc
Both Cooked Sweet Potato, Baked In Skin, Flesh with Salt as well as Raw Navel Oranges lack sufficient amounts of Selenium in 300 calories.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 300 calories:
300 calories of Cooked Sweet Potato, Baked In Skin, Flesh with Salt have 1.2 times more Protein than Navel Oranges.
While 300 kcal of Raw Navel Oranges contain 2.4 times more Sugars and 8.3 times more Fructose than Cooked Sweet Potato, Baked In Skin, Flesh with Salt.
Both Cooked Sweet Potato, Baked In Skin, Flesh with Salt and Navel Oranges offer comparable quantities of Energy, Carbohydrate and Fiber per 300 calories.
Both Cooked Sweet Potato, Baked In Skin, Flesh with Salt as well as Raw Navel Oranges provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3 and Omega 6 in 300 calories.