Comparing Nutrients in 500 calories Composite Household Vegetable ShorteningVS California Avocados
Weight per 500 calories
Composite Household Vegetable Shortening
56.6g
California Avocados
299g
Composite Household Vegetable Shortening has 5.3 times more energy per 100g than California Avocados. It has very high energy density when compared to other foods. Raw California Avocados having above average energy density.
Discover which food has more nutrients per 500 calories - Composite Household Vegetable Shortening or California Avocados?
Composite Household Vegetable Shortening VS California Avocados Nutrients Per 500 Kcal
Discover which food has more nutrients per 500 calories - Composite Household Vegetable Shortening or California Avocados?
Lets compare vitamin content per 500 calories of Composite Household Vegetable Shortening vs California Avocados:
500 kcal of Raw California Avocados contain 19.9 times more Vitamin B1, more Vitamin B2, more Vitamin B3, 11.4 times more Vitamin B5, 1519.2 times more Vitamin B6, more Vitamin B9, more Vitamin C, 1.7 times more Vitamin E and 2.1 times more Vitamin K than Composite Household Vegetable Shortening.
500 calories of Composite Household Vegetable Shortening have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B1, Vitamin B2, Vitamin B3, Vitamin B5, Vitamin B6, Vitamin B9 and Vitamin C
Both Composite Household Vegetable Shortening as well as Raw California Avocados have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D in 500 calories.
Comparing minerals per 500 calories for Composite Household Vegetable Shortening vs California Avocados:
500 kcal of Raw California Avocados contain more Copper, 46.1 times more Iron, more Magnesium, more Manganese, more Phosphorus, more Potassium and more Zinc than Composite Household Vegetable Shortening.
500 calories of Composite Household Vegetable Shortening lack sufficient amounts of Copper, Iron, Magnesium, Manganese, Phosphorus, Potassium and Zinc
Both Composite Household Vegetable Shortening as well as Raw California Avocados lack sufficient amounts of Calcium and Selenium in 500 calories.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 500 calories:
500 calories of Composite Household Vegetable Shortening have 1.2 times more Fat, 2.2 times more Saturated Fat, 2.8 times more Omega 3 and 3 times more Omega 6 than California Avocados.
While 500 kcal of Raw California Avocados contain more Carbohydrate, more Fiber and more Protein than Composite Household Vegetable Shortening.
Both Composite Household Vegetable Shortening and California Avocados offer comparable quantities of Energy per 500 calories.
500 calories of Composite Household Vegetable Shortening provide inadequate amounts of Carbohydrate, Fiber and Protein