Comparing Nutrients in 500 calories Composite Household Vegetable ShorteningVS Bananas
Weight per 500 calories
Composite Household Vegetable Shortening
56.6g
Bananas
562g
Composite Household Vegetable Shortening has 9.9 times more energy per 100g than Bananas. It has very high energy density when compared to other foods. Raw Bananas having average energy density.
Discover which food has more nutrients per 500 calories - Composite Household Vegetable Shortening or Bananas?
Composite Household Vegetable Shortening VS Bananas Nutrients Per 500 Kcal
Discover which food has more nutrients per 500 calories - Composite Household Vegetable Shortening or Bananas?
Lets compare vitamin content per 500 calories of Composite Household Vegetable Shortening vs Bananas:
500 calories of Composite Household Vegetable Shortening have 6.2 times more Vitamin E and 10.7 times more Vitamin K than Bananas.
While 500 kcal of Raw Bananas contain 15.4 times more Vitamin B1, more Vitamin B2, more Vitamin B3, 4.9 times more Vitamin B5, 3645.3 times more Vitamin B6, more Vitamin B9 and more Vitamin C than Composite Household Vegetable Shortening.
500 calories of Composite Household Vegetable Shortening have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B1, Vitamin B2, Vitamin B3, Vitamin B5, Vitamin B6, Vitamin B9 and Vitamin C
500 calories of Bananas have insufficient amounts of Vitamin E and Vitamin K
Both Composite Household Vegetable Shortening as well as Raw Bananas have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D in 500 calories.
Comparing minerals per 500 calories for Composite Household Vegetable Shortening vs Bananas:
500 kcal of Raw Bananas contain more Copper, 36.9 times more Iron, more Magnesium, more Manganese, more Phosphorus, more Potassium, more Selenium and more Water than Composite Household Vegetable Shortening.
500 calories of Composite Household Vegetable Shortening lack sufficient amounts of Copper, Iron, Magnesium, Manganese, Phosphorus, Potassium and Selenium
Both Composite Household Vegetable Shortening as well as Raw Bananas lack sufficient amounts of Calcium and Zinc in 500 calories.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 500 calories:
500 calories of Composite Household Vegetable Shortening have 30.5 times more Fat, 22.5 times more Saturated Fat, 7 times more Omega 3 and 57.4 times more Omega 6 than Bananas.
While 500 kcal of Raw Bananas contain more Carbohydrate, more Sugars, more Fiber and more Protein than Composite Household Vegetable Shortening.
Both Composite Household Vegetable Shortening and Bananas offer comparable quantities of Energy per 500 calories.
500 calories of Composite Household Vegetable Shortening provide inadequate amounts of Carbohydrate, Fiber and Protein
500 calories of Bananas provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3 and Omega 6