Nutrient Comparison: California Red Kidney Beans VS Cooked Taro per 100 g
Compare the macro and micronutrient content in 100 g of California Red Kidney Beans versus 100 g of Cooked Taro to make informed dietary choices. Explore their nutritional differences and benefits.
Lets compare vitamin content per 100 grams of California Red Kidney Beans vs Cooked Taro:
- 100 grams of California Red Kidney Beans have 4.9 times more Vitamin B1, 7.8 times more Vitamin B2, 4 times more Vitamin B3, 2.3 times more Vitamin B5 and 20.7 times more Vitamin B9 than Cooked Taro.
- Both California Red Kidney Beans and Cooked Taro provide similar amounts of Vitamin B6 and Vitamin C per 100 grams.
- Both Raw California Red Kidney Beans as well as Cooked Taro no Salt have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D in 100 grams.
Comparing minerals per 100 grams for California Red Kidney Beans vs Cooked Taro:
- 100 grams of California Red Kidney Beans have 10.8 times more Calcium, 5.5 times more Copper, 13 times more Iron, 5.3 times more Magnesium, 2.2 times more Manganese, 5.3 times more Phosphorus, 3.1 times more Potassium, 3.6 times more Selenium and 9.4 times more Zinc than Cooked Taro.
- 100 grams of Cooked Taro lack sufficient amounts of Calcium and Selenium
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 100 grams:
- 100 grams of California Red Kidney Beans have 2.3 times more Energy, 6 times more Omega 3, 1.7 times more Carbohydrate, 4.9 times more Fiber and 46.9 times more Protein than Cooked Taro.
- 100 grams of Cooked Taro provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3 and Protein
- Both Raw California Red Kidney Beans as well as Cooked Taro no Salt provide inadequate amounts of Omega 6 in 100 grams.