Nutrient Comparison: Candies, sweet chocolate VS Cassava per 100 g
Compare the macro and micronutrient content in 100 g of Candies, sweet chocolate versus 100 g of Cassava to make informed dietary choices. Explore their nutritional differences and benefits.
Lets compare vitamin content per 100 grams of Candies, sweet chocolate vs Cassava:
- 100 grams of Candies, sweet chocolate have 5 times more Vitamin B2 and 3.3 times more Vitamin K than Cassava.
- While 100 g of Raw Cassava contain 4.4 times more Vitamin B1, 1.3 times more Vitamin B3, 1.5 times more Vitamin B5, 2 times more Vitamin B6, 9 times more Vitamin B9 and more Vitamin C than Candies, sweet chocolate.
- 100 grams of Candies, sweet chocolate have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B1, Vitamin B5, Vitamin B9 and Vitamin C
- 100 grams of Cassava have insufficient amounts of Vitamin K
- Both Candies, sweet chocolate as well as Raw Cassava have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin B12, Vitamin D and Vitamin E in 100 grams.
Comparing minerals per 100 grams for Candies, sweet chocolate vs Cassava:
- 100 grams of Candies, sweet chocolate have 1.5 times more Calcium, 5.7 times more Copper, 10.2 times more Iron, 5.4 times more Magnesium, 1.3 times more Manganese, 5.4 times more Phosphorus, 4 times more Selenium and 4.4 times more Zinc than Cassava.
- Both Candies, sweet chocolate and Cassava contain similar levels of Potassium per 100 grams.
- 100 grams of Cassava lack sufficient amounts of Calcium and Selenium
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 100 grams:
- 100 grams of Candies, sweet chocolate have 3.2 times more Energy, 122.1 times more Fat, 271.4 times more Saturated Fat, 30 times more Omega 6, 1.6 times more Carbohydrate, 30.3 times more Sugars, 3.1 times more Fiber and 2.9 times more Protein than Cassava.
- 100 grams of Cassava provide inadequate amounts of Omega 6
- Both Candies, sweet chocolate as well as Raw Cassava provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3 in 100 grams.