Nutrient Comparison: Cassava VS Natto per 100 g
Compare the macro and micronutrient content in 100 g of Cassava versus 100 g of Natto to make informed dietary choices. Explore their nutritional differences and benefits.
Lets compare vitamin content per 100 grams of Cassava vs Natto:
- 100 grams of Cassava have more Vitamin B3, 3.4 times more Vitamin B9 and 1.6 times more Vitamin C than Natto.
- While 100 g of Natto contain 1.8 times more Vitamin B1, 4 times more Vitamin B2, 2 times more Vitamin B5, 1.5 times more Vitamin B6 and 12.2 times more Vitamin K than Raw Cassava.
- 100 grams of Cassava have insufficient amounts of Vitamin K
- 100 grams of Natto have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B3
- Both Raw Cassava as well as Natto have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin B12, Vitamin D and Vitamin E in 100 grams.
Comparing minerals per 100 grams for Cassava vs Natto:
- 100 g of Natto contain 13.6 times more Calcium, 6.7 times more Copper, 31.9 times more Iron, 5.5 times more Magnesium, 4 times more Manganese, 6.4 times more Phosphorus, 2.7 times more Potassium, 12.6 times more Selenium and 8.9 times more Zinc than Raw Cassava.
- 100 grams of Cassava lack sufficient amounts of Calcium and Selenium
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 100 grams:
- 100 grams of Cassava have 3 times more Carbohydrate than Natto.
- While 100 g of Natto contain 1.3 times more Energy, 39.3 times more Fat, 21.5 times more Saturated Fat, 43.2 times more Omega 3, 171.1 times more Omega 6, 2.9 times more Sugars, 3 times more Fiber and 14.3 times more Protein than Raw Cassava.
- 100 grams of Cassava provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3 and Omega 6