Nutrient Comparison: Cocoa mix, NESTLE, Rich Chocolate Hot Cocoa Mix VS Baked Potato Flesh per 100 g
Compare the macro and micronutrient content in 100 g of Cocoa mix, NESTLE, Rich Chocolate Hot Cocoa Mix versus 100 g of Baked Potato Flesh to make informed dietary choices. Explore their nutritional differences and benefits.
Lets compare vitamin content per 100 grams of Cocoa mix, NESTLE, Rich Chocolate Hot Cocoa Mix vs Baked Potato Flesh:
- 100 g of Baked Potatoes Flesh no Salt contain more Vitamin C than Cocoa mix, NESTLE, Rich Chocolate Hot Cocoa Mix.
- 100 grams of Cocoa mix, NESTLE, Rich Chocolate Hot Cocoa Mix have insufficient amounts of Vitamin C
Comparing minerals per 100 grams for Cocoa mix, NESTLE, Rich Chocolate Hot Cocoa Mix vs Baked Potato Flesh:
- 100 grams of Cocoa mix, NESTLE, Rich Chocolate Hot Cocoa Mix have 20 times more Calcium, 5.1 times more Iron and 170 times more Sodium than Baked Potato Flesh.
- While 100 g of Baked Potatoes Flesh no Salt contain more Potassium and 20.2 times more Water than Cocoa mix, NESTLE, Rich Chocolate Hot Cocoa Mix.
- 100 grams of Cocoa mix, NESTLE, Rich Chocolate Hot Cocoa Mix lack sufficient amounts of Potassium
- 100 grams of Baked Potato Flesh lack sufficient amounts of Calcium
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 100 grams:
- 100 grams of Cocoa mix, NESTLE, Rich Chocolate Hot Cocoa Mix have 4.3 times more Energy, 150 times more Fat, 384.6 times more Saturated Fat, 3.5 times more Carbohydrate, 35.3 times more Sugars, 2.7 times more Fiber and 1.5 times more Protein than Baked Potato Flesh.