Nutrient Comparison: Canned Coconut Milk VS Baked Potato Flesh per 100 g
Compare the macro and micronutrient content in 100 g of Canned Coconut Milk versus 100 g of Baked Potato Flesh to make informed dietary choices. Explore their nutritional differences and benefits.
Lets compare vitamin content per 100 grams of Canned Coconut Milk vs Baked Potato Flesh:
- 100 grams of Canned Coconut Milk have 1.6 times more Vitamin B9 than Baked Potato Flesh.
- While 100 g of Baked Potatoes Flesh no Salt contain 4.8 times more Vitamin B1, 2.2 times more Vitamin B3, 3.6 times more Vitamin B5, 10.8 times more Vitamin B6 and 12.8 times more Vitamin C than Canned Coconut Milk.
- 100 grams of Canned Coconut Milk have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B1 and Vitamin C
- Both Canned Coconut Milk as well as Baked Potatoes Flesh no Salt have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin B2, Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D in 100 grams.
Comparing minerals per 100 grams for Canned Coconut Milk vs Baked Potato Flesh:
- 100 grams of Canned Coconut Milk have 9.4 times more Iron, 1.8 times more Magnesium, 4.8 times more Manganese, 1.9 times more Phosphorus and 1.9 times more Zinc than Baked Potato Flesh.
- While 100 g of Baked Potatoes Flesh no Salt contain 1.8 times more Potassium than Canned Coconut Milk.
- Both Canned Coconut Milk and Baked Potato Flesh contain similar levels of Copper per 100 grams.
- Both Canned Coconut Milk as well as Baked Potatoes Flesh no Salt lack sufficient amounts of Calcium in 100 grams.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 100 grams:
- 100 grams of Canned Coconut Milk have 2.1 times more Energy, 213.3 times more Fat and 727.5 times more Saturated Fat than Baked Potato Flesh.
- While 100 g of Baked Potatoes Flesh no Salt contain 7.7 times more Carbohydrate than Canned Coconut Milk.
- Both Canned Coconut Milk and Baked Potato Flesh offer comparable quantities of Protein per 100 grams.
- Both Canned Coconut Milk as well as Baked Potatoes Flesh no Salt provide inadequate amounts of Omega 6 in 100 grams.