Nutrient Comparison: Baked Potato Flesh VS Feijoa per 100 g
Compare the macro and micronutrient content in 100 g of Baked Potato Flesh versus 100 g of Feijoa to make informed dietary choices. Explore their nutritional differences and benefits.
Lets compare vitamin content per 100 grams of Baked Potato Flesh vs Feijoa:
- 100 grams of Baked Potato Flesh have 17.5 times more Vitamin B1, 4.7 times more Vitamin B3, 2.4 times more Vitamin B5 and 4.5 times more Vitamin B6 than Feijoa.
- While 100 g of Raw Feijoa contain 2.6 times more Vitamin B9, 2.6 times more Vitamin C and 11.7 times more Vitamin K than Baked Potatoes Flesh no Salt.
- 100 grams of Baked Potato Flesh have insufficient amounts of Vitamin K
- 100 grams of Feijoa have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B1 and Vitamin B3
- Both Baked Potatoes Flesh no Salt as well as Raw Feijoa have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin B2, Vitamin B12 and Vitamin E in 100 grams.
Comparing minerals per 100 grams for Baked Potato Flesh vs Feijoa:
- 100 grams of Baked Potato Flesh have 6 times more Copper, 2.5 times more Iron, 2.8 times more Magnesium, 1.9 times more Manganese, 2.6 times more Phosphorus, 2.3 times more Potassium and 4.8 times more Zinc than Feijoa.
- Both Baked Potato Flesh and Feijoa contain similar levels of Water per 100 grams.
- 100 grams of Feijoa lack sufficient amounts of Iron and Zinc
- Both Baked Potatoes Flesh no Salt as well as Raw Feijoa lack sufficient amounts of Calcium in 100 grams.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 100 grams:
- 100 grams of Baked Potato Flesh have 1.5 times more Energy, 1.4 times more Carbohydrate and 2.8 times more Protein than Feijoa.
- While 100 g of Raw Feijoa contain 4.8 times more Sugars and 4.3 times more Fiber than Baked Potatoes Flesh no Salt.
- 100 grams of Feijoa provide inadequate amounts of Protein
- Both Baked Potatoes Flesh no Salt as well as Raw Feijoa provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3 and Omega 6 in 100 grams.